IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlnrp/2002234.html

Psychological Harm in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Concept Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Toufic El Hussein
  • Dawson S. Sheehan

Abstract

AimTo clarify and define the concept of psychological harm in high-fidelity simulation.BackgroundHigh-fidelity simulation is widely used in undergraduate nursing education to promote clinical competence and decision-making. While often beneficial, emotionally intense or poorly supported simulation experiences can result in psychological harm, an underrecognized phenomenon that may disrupt learning, self-efficacy, and professional development. Current literature lacks conceptual clarity to distinguish psychological harm from expected simulation-related stress.DesignConcept analysis.MethodologyA concept analysis was conducted using the method developed by Walker and Avant to explore psychological harm in the context of high-fidelity simulation.Data SourcesPeer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and TRIP Pro. Inclusion criteria focused on articles that discussed psychological or emotional responses to high-fidelity simulation in healthcare education. Empirical peer-reviewed literature informed the identification of defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. Practice-oriented documents and standards were reviewed to contextualize disciplinary usage; studies focused solely on technical skill acquisition were excluded.ResultsThree defining attributes were identified: (1) absence of psychological safety, (2) emotional disruption exceeding expected learning stress, and (3) sustained emotional impact beyond the simulation experience. Antecedents included emotionally intense content, insufficient preparation, unskilled facilitation, and performance-oriented learning environments. Consequences included diminished self-confidence, avoidance of future simulation, and impaired transfer of learning to clinical practice. Recent qualitative findings revealed that harm is often internalized and shaped by relational dynamics with simulationists and peers.ConclusionPsychological harm in high-fidelity simulation is a multidimensional, learner-dependent experience that can hinder both academic and professional development. This concept analysis offers a foundational definition and theoretical structure to support future research, education, and policy related to learner well-being in simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Toufic El Hussein & Dawson S. Sheehan, 2026. "Psychological Harm in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Concept Analysis," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2026, pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:2002234
    DOI: 10.1155/nrp/2002234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2026/2002234.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2026/2002234.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/nrp/2002234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:2002234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.