IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/290912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The More Supply Chain Control Power, the Better? A Comparison among Four Kinds of Cooperation Models

Author

Listed:
  • Weihua Liu
  • Shuqing Wang
  • Donglei Zhu

Abstract

This paper introduces the parameter of supply chain control power into existing supply chain coordination models and explores the impacts of control power on the profits of manufacturer, retailer, and the overall supply chain under four modes of decision-making, including the decentralized decision-making dominated by manufacturer, the decentralized decision-making dominated by retailer, centralized decision-making, and Nash negotiation decision-making. Some significant conclusions are obtained. Firstly, supply chain control power does have great impact on the supply chain profits. The profit of the whole supply chain with centralized decision-making is higher than those of the other three modes, while the overall profit of supply chain with decentralized decision-making is superior to the profit when retailer and manufacturer dominate the supply chain together. Secondly, with decentralized decision-making, for manufacturer and retailer, it is beneficial to gain the control powers of the supply chain; however, control power has an optimal value, not the bigger, the better. Thirdly, under certain circumstances, order quantity will increase and the wholesale price will decrease when control power is transferred from manufacturer to retailer. In this case, the total profit of supply chain dominated by retailer will be greater than that dominated by manufacturer.

Suggested Citation

  • Weihua Liu & Shuqing Wang & Donglei Zhu, 2015. "The More Supply Chain Control Power, the Better? A Comparison among Four Kinds of Cooperation Models," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:290912
    DOI: 10.1155/2015/290912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2015/290912.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/MPE/2015/290912.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2015/290912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:290912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.