IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnlmpe/1827125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Academic Evaluation Practice of Theoretical Courses of Physical and Vocal Music Education Major under the Concept of Quantitative Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Shuaitong Wang
  • Ning Cao

Abstract

Under the rapid progress of educational reform, the evaluation method of students’ studies in China is only partially adjusted or even remains at the same level for a long time. There will be a growing gap between it and the existing education system and social needs. Therefore, based on the concept of quantitative evaluation, the gap and unreasonable evaluation methods of academic evaluation of theoretical courses of physical and vocal music education majors caused by unfair educational resources and physical conditions of Chinese students have been studied. Student Growth Percentile (SGP) academic evaluation model based on the current education situation in China is proposed. By analyzing the establishment process of this model and comparing it with the current two academic evaluation models, the advantages and disadvantages of the SGP model are analyzed. Then, a practical application case of the SGP model in a place is used to show the model’s actual evaluation process and feedback results. Through the SGP model on the growth evaluation of group students and the teaching evaluation of teachers, the growth and problems of students in this stage and whether the teachers’ teaching is effective are analyzed to obtain the pertinent results. Finally, the students and teachers are investigated, and their satisfaction with this model is 81% and 75%, respectively, proving this model’s reliability and practicality.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuaitong Wang & Ning Cao, 2022. "The Academic Evaluation Practice of Theoretical Courses of Physical and Vocal Music Education Major under the Concept of Quantitative Evaluation," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:1827125
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1827125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/1827125.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/1827125.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/1827125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnlmpe:1827125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.