IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnljam/817921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of a Fuzzy Genetic and Simulated Annealing Algorithm Approach for Project Time-Cost Tradeoff

Author

Listed:
  • Nataša Glišović

Abstract

Project planning, defining the limitations and resources by leveling the resources available, have a great importance for the management projects. All these activities directly affect the duration and the cost of the project. To get a competitive value on the market, the project must be completed at the optimum time. In other to be competitive enough the optimum or near optimum solutions of time cost tradeoff and the resource leveling and resource constrained scheduling problems should be obtained in the planning phase of the project. One important aspect of the project management is activity crashing, that is, reducing activity time by adding more resources such as workers and overtime. It is important to decide the optimal crash plan to complete the project within the desired time period. The comparison of fuzzy simulated annealing and the genetic algorithm based on the crashing method is introduced in this paper to evaluate project networks and determine the optimum crashing configuration that minimizes the average project cost, caused by being late and crashing costs in the presence of vagueness and uncertainty. The evaluation results based on a real case study indicate that the method can be reliably applied to engineering projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataša Glišović, 2014. "Comparison of a Fuzzy Genetic and Simulated Annealing Algorithm Approach for Project Time-Cost Tradeoff," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnljam:817921
    DOI: 10.1155/2014/817921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/JAM/2014/817921.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/JAM/2014/817921.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2014/817921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnljam:817921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.