IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/jnljam/346763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking DMUs by Calculating the Interval Efficiency with a Common Set of Weights in DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Vahideh Rezaie
  • Tahir Ahmad
  • Siti-Rahmah Awang
  • Masumeh Khanmohammadi
  • Normah Maan

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of decision making units (DMUs), data envelopment analysis (DEA) was introduced. Basically, the traditional DEA scheme calculates the best relative efficiency score (i.e., the “optimistic” efficiency) of each DMU with the most favorable weights. A decision maker may be unable to compare and fully rank the efficiencies of different DMUs that are calculated using these potentially distinct sets of weights on the same basis. Based on the literature, the assignable worst relative efficiency score (i.e., the “pessimistic” efficiency) for each DMU can also be determined. In this paper, the best and the worst relative efficiencies are considered simultaneously. To measure the overall performance of the DMUs, an integration of both the best and the worst relative efficiencies is considered in the form of an interval. The advantage of this efficiency interval is that it provides all of the possible efficiency values and an expanded overview to the decision maker. The proposed method determines the lower- and upper-bounds of the interval efficiency over a common set of weights. To demonstrate the implementation of the introduced method, a numerical example is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Vahideh Rezaie & Tahir Ahmad & Siti-Rahmah Awang & Masumeh Khanmohammadi & Normah Maan, 2014. "Ranking DMUs by Calculating the Interval Efficiency with a Common Set of Weights in DEA," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:jnljam:346763
    DOI: 10.1155/2014/346763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/JAM/2014/346763.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/JAM/2014/346763.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2014/346763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I. Contreras & S. Lozano & M. A. Hinojosa, 2021. "A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 2181-2201, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:jnljam:346763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.