IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/9938367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CNN-Based Medical Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Siyuan Zhang
  • Yifan Wang
  • Jiayao Jiang
  • Jingxian Dong
  • Weiwei Yi
  • Wenguang Hou
  • Hocine Cherifi

Abstract

The quality of ultrasound image is a key information in medical related application. It is also an important index in evaluating the performance of ultrasonic imaging equipment and image processing algorithms. Yet, there is still no recognized quantitative standard about medical image quality assessment (IQA) due to the fact that IQA is traditionally regarded as a subjective issue, especially in case of the ultrasound medical images. As such, the medical ultrasound IQA on basis of convolutional neural network (CNN) is quantitatively studied in this paper. Firstly, a dataset with 1063 ultrasound images is established through degenerating a certain number of original high-quality images. Subsequently, some operations are performed for the dataset including scoring and abnormal value screening. Then, 478 ultrasonic images are selected as the training and testing examples. The label of each example is obtained by averaging the scores of different doctors. Afterwards, a deep CNN network and a residuals network are taken to establish the IQA models. Meanwhile, the transfer learning strategy is introduced here to accelerate the training and improve the robustness of the model considering the fact that the ultrasound image samples are not abundant. At last, some tests are taken to evaluate the IQA models. They show that the CNN-based IQA is feasible and effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyuan Zhang & Yifan Wang & Jiayao Jiang & Jingxian Dong & Weiwei Yi & Wenguang Hou & Hocine Cherifi, 2021. "CNN-Based Medical Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9938367
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/9938367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/9938367.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/complexity/2021/9938367.xml
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/9938367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9938367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.