Author
Listed:
- David S. Byrne
- Emma Uprichard
- Gill Callaghan
Abstract
This paper advances a framework for complexity-informed action research as a mode of governance for addressing the contemporary polycrisis in socio-ecological systems. It argues that knowledge is not merely representational but possesses causal power in shaping future system trajectories and that research and governance are inseparable, recursive practices. Transformation involves imagining desired futures, and transformative knowledge is created in action within complex socio-ecological systems. Building on complexity theory and participatory action research, the paper identifies organic intellectuals within governance institutions as key agents of transformation and positions grey literature as a primary and underutilised knowledge base for understanding and intervening in real governance processes. We argue for action research based on collaboration between individual and collective actors in civil society through the construction of scenarios built on narratives. Scenario narratives of path-dependent pasts and desired futures are causally effective fields of action that structure possibilities for collective agency. Narrative scenario construction is shown to operate through recursive bottom-up and top-down dynamics, enabling the co-production of desired futures across institutional and civil-society actors. The paper proposes the city-region as a critical governance scale at which participatory scenario building can most effectively integrate situated knowledge, professional expertise and institutional capacity. Narrative scenario-based action research is therefore presented not as a supplement to policy or technical modelling, but as a distinct governance practice capable of reshaping attractor landscapes and opening pathways towards more equitable and sustainable socio-ecological futures.
Suggested Citation
David S. Byrne & Emma Uprichard & Gill Callaghan, 2026.
"Social Human Complexity and Global Challenges: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Contributions for Transformative Change,"
Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2026, pages 1-14, May.
Handle:
RePEc:hin:complx:1588585
DOI: 10.1155/cplx/1588585
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:1588585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.