Author
Abstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting the global economy, transforming corporate strategies and enhancing operational efficiency. This study aims to analyze the relative efficiency of the Generative AI (GenAI) market, considering the market size of chips, servers, and data center infrastructure required for its operation, and comparing these market sizes with the market size of AI solutions. The study hypothesizes that the current AI market, despite its rapid development, is characterized by a catching-up nature compared to the component market and does not yet fully reflect the proportional relationship between the volumes of these markets (the hardware market and the AI solutions market). It is emphasized that the capital expenditures of technology giants on the creation of AI infrastructure have significantly increased, which may require decades to achieve a balance between the size of the hardware market that supports AI and the size of the AI solutions market itself. To assess the efficiency of the AI market, the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology is applied, considering «inputs» (the market size of components) and "outputs" (the market size of AI solutions). The results of the DEA analysis of the GenAI market dynamics from 2016 to 2024 reveal a non-linear nature of development, starting in 2021, with a trend reversal and a decrease in efficiency indicators, which confirms the hypothesis of the catching-up nature of AI technologies compared to the component market. It is shown that fluctuations in efficiency begin three years after the deployment of the first large language models, indicating their significance for the demand for hardware, but not yet demonstrating sufficient returns in the form of a comparable growth of the AI solutions market. The limitations of the study are associated with the time interval of analysis (2016-2024) and the composition of the companies included in the analysis, which covers a majority, but not the entire, market. The novelty of the study lies in the application of DEA analysis for a comprehensive assessment of the AI market considering, but divides the component market and the technological solutions market of AI usage. The results obtained provide a critical assessment of the prospects for the development of the AI market and identify an imbalance between the «soft» (technological solutions) and «hard» (components) markets, identifying the potential for more efficient exploration and use of generative models. However, the results require further development in terms of describing the effects in different sectors of the economy.
Suggested Citation
Yaroslav Kuzminov & Ekaterina Kruchinskaia, 2025.
"Efficiency Assessment of the Artificial Intelligence Market: Exploring the Limits,"
Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 19(4), pages 6-16.
Handle:
RePEc:hig:fsight:v:19:y:2025:i:4:p:6-16
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
- O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:19:y:2025:i:4:p:6-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.