IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecosoc/v16y2015i2p110-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conversation with Mark Mizruchi: “There is Very Little Organizational Theory Left in Sociology Departments” (interviewed by Igor Chirikov)

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Mizruchi

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Prof. Mizruchi was interviewed by Igor Chirikov, senior research fellow at the National Research University Higher School of Economics in Moscow. In the interview, Prof. Mizruchi was asked about the evolution of his research interests and peculiarities of his approach to teaching organizational theory. Prof. Mizruchi also described how he became acquainted with organizational sociology. Within his winding career trajectory from Statistical Analyst at Albert Einstein College of Medicine to Professor of Sociology at the University of Michigan, Mark Mizruchi has witnessed the development of both organizational theory and sociology of organizations and their division into institutionally separate subfields. Whether such fragmentation is methodologically important, it certainly affects the teaching process of organizational theories to students and the future of the whole field by shifting its research focus from broad and theoretical issues to more narrow and applied problems. In addition, Prof. Mizruchi shared the main ideas of his recent award-winning book (The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite) and details of the creative writing process. In the final part of the conversation, Prof. Mizruchi told the story of how the Interdisciplinary Committee on Organizational Studies (ICOS) was established and how it influences research and teaching processes at the University of Michigan.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Mizruchi, 2015. "Conversation with Mark Mizruchi: “There is Very Little Organizational Theory Left in Sociology Departments” (interviewed by Igor Chirikov)," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 110-118.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:110-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecsoc.hse.ru/en/2015-16-2.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational theory; sociology of organizations; economic sociology; political sociology; corporate interlocks; social network analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:16:y:2015:i:2:p:110-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zoya Kotelnikova or Zoya Kotelnikova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.