IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecosoc/v13y2012i4p116-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambivalent Consumer Attitudes toward Counterfeits

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Khramova

    (Ipsos LLC)

Abstract

The paper is devoted to Russian consumers’ ambivalent attitudes toward counterfeits. Despite the common rhetoric of struggle with counterfeits, trademark owners and consumers often behave in a contradictory way with regard to fakes. The paper is aimed at revealing major predictors of ambivalent consumer attitudes toward counterfeits. The survey covers more than 2000 respondents. The sample represents the gender, age, and regional affiliation of people consuming alcohol beverages (18–65 years) in the Russian Federation. According to the research findings, the declared attitudes often contradict the real behavior patterns in two ways: 1) neutral and positive attitudes are accompanied by the absence of the experience in buying counterfeits, and 2) negative attitudes are accompanied by the experience in buying counterfeits. The first type of ambivalent consumer attitudes can be explained by demographic characteristics (gender, age, income) and can be interpreted as consumers’ deliberate rejection of purchases of counterfeits. The second type can be explained not only by income and education but also by category of goods and structure of consumer motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Khramova, 2012. "Ambivalent Consumer Attitudes toward Counterfeits," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(4), pages 116-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:116-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ecsoc.hse.ru/en/2012-13-4.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecosoc:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:116-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zoya Kotelnikova or Zoya Kotelnikova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.