IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/ecohse/202036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

«An Imaginary Patient» or What Should Be the Financing of Patronized Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Rubinstein

    (Institute of Economics, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article discusses the problems of budget financing of patronized goods in the sphere of culture, education and science, the peculiarity of which is the presence of the well-known pat­tern of «Baumol's disease» or «Cost Disease». A theoretical analysis and empirical calculations were presented, which confirmed this pattern on the example of Russian theaters. A concept was proposed, – «technological productivity», which, in the author’s opinion, was more consistent with the content of «the cost disease» and with the phenomenon of performance lag in perfor­ming arts from overall productivity in the economy, which determined the impossibility of their market self-sufficiency. In contrast to the standard theory, according to which financing of pat­ronized goods is interpreted as government actions, aimed at compensating the expenses of producers of these special goods and services, this work uses a different approach, according to which the budget funds allocated to producers of patronized goods should be considered qualityof services. It was shown that the equilibrium conditions for the patronized goods can state pay­ment for the recoverable social usefulness of the corresponding goods and serve as a theoretical justification for determining the total (gross) income of their producers in the form of the sum of revenue and budget subsidies, which is also consistent with the system of national accounts. To measure the real value of total income, the components of which are deflated by different price indices, a composite index was proposed in its simple, parametric and normative form, and the dynamics of real total income and the full performance of theaters in the period from 2001 through 2018 were calculated. The article presented a methodology for the monetary as­sessment of the social utility of patronized goods in the cultural sphere – the size of the budget subsidy, which is based on the normative principle of equality between the growth rate of total labor productivity in performing arts organizations and the growth rate of productivity in the economy. On its basis, the dynamics of the minimum level of budget subsidies to theaters were calculated and the sizes of their underfunding in certain years of the period from 2001 through 2018 were determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Rubinstein, 2020. "«An Imaginary Patient» or What Should Be the Financing of Patronized Goods," HSE Economic Journal, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 24(3), pages 434-464.
  • Handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2020:3:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ej.hse.ru/en/2020-24-3/410014160.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    patronized goods; culture; science; education; «cost disease»; productivity; income; prices; subsidies; price index;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation
    • L38 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Policy
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:ecohse:2020:3:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial board or Editorial board (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.