IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

History of the principle of comparative advantage revisited: what makes a satisfactory definition?


  • Martin Grancay

    () (Ekonomická Univerzita v Bratislave)

  • Nora Szikorova

    (Ekonomická Univerzita v Bratislave)


The authorship of the principle of comparative advantage has been attributed to different economists, most often to David Ricardo, Robert Torrens or James Mill. The motivation for this paper stems from the assumption that diverging views on authorship of the principle are caused by diverse definitions of its satisfactory formulation. We argue a complete definition of the principle of comparative advantage rests on seven elements and suggest four of them are sufficient to deem a definition satisfactory. Taking into account specifics of the early nineteenth-century economics, only two elements – namely comparison of ratios and statement of gains from trade – were necessary. We analyze ten early nineteenth-century works and determine whether they include these elements. Our research confirms the view that Ricardo was the first to successfully state the principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Grancay & Nora Szikorova, 2013. "History of the principle of comparative advantage revisited: what makes a satisfactory definition?," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 21(3), pages 43-68.
  • Handle: RePEc:hid:journl:v:21:y:2013:3:2:p:43-68

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Morales Meoqui, Jorge, 2012. "On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition," MPRA Paper 35905, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hid:journl:v:21:y:2013:3:2:p:43-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mario Aldo Cedrini). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.