IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gvi/asrjnl/v4y2017i19id2829.html

Empirical Analysis of Firm’s Risk by their Degree of leverages: Employ at Textile Industry of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Zakir Raheem
  • Sakheela Raees
  • Anam Zakir

Abstract

This paper measures the risk of firms with respect to their degree of total leverage (DTL), degree of operating leverage (DOL) and degree of financial leverage (DFL). This paper is more concerned with the application of proposed relationship found in literature about these theories with the level of risk by taking actual data of companies. Further, prior researchers prove this theory of DTL by using some assumptions and hypothetical data but this research has analyzed actual records of Textile Firms listed at Karachi Stock Exchange to check the durability of the theory. For this, firstly DTL, DOL and DFL of selected companies have been calculated by using their true records. Then, in the following year changes had been analyzed that whether changes occurred according to the same results as predicted by DTL or not. Result suggests that there is more variation in profits (loss) than expected according to their degrees, which shows that on average firms under consideration are riskier. At the end, this study also highlighted some factors which may cause the variation more than expected and make the firms riskier.

Suggested Citation

  • Zakir Raheem & Sakheela Raees & Anam Zakir, 2017. "Empirical Analysis of Firm’s Risk by their Degree of leverages: Employ at Textile Industry of Pakistan," Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, Scholar Publishing, United Kingdom, vol. 4(19), pages 94-102, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gvi:asrjnl:v:4:y:2017:i:19:id:2829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scholarpublishing.org/journals/index.php/ASSRJ/article/view/2829
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scholarpublishing.org/journals/index.php/ASSRJ/article/download/2829/2867
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gvi:asrjnl:v:4:y:2017:i:19:id:2829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Albert Jackson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://scholarpublishing.org/journals/index.php/ASSRJ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.