IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gok/arviv1/v55y2013i1p56-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Inequalities, Level Differentials and Progress Assessment: Case of Measles Vaccination Coverage in India

Author

Listed:
  • William Joe

Abstract

This paper attempts to assess progress in measles vaccination coverage in India using a method that accounts both for health inequalities and level-differentials with the help of data from the National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) for 1992-1993 and 2005-2006. Methods such as rate-ratio, rate-differentials, concentration index, group analogue of Gini coefficient and level-sensitive progress index have been adopted for this purpose. Results indicate that there are high income-related and group-related inequalities in measles vaccination coverage. The intersectional group of rural-female-SC ST, particularly from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, are most disadvantaged. The progress is biased as richer and advantaged sections benefited disproportionately from expansion in coverage. Tamil Nadu, West Bengal and Kerala emerge as best performers. Supplementary immunization activities for measles can be effective in promoting health equity in a cost-effective manner. Rural areas and regions with high concentration of SC and ST communities should be explicitly targeted. Like Polio, global declaration for elimination of measles is important to generate political will for rapid progress.

Suggested Citation

  • William Joe, 2013. "Health Inequalities, Level Differentials and Progress Assessment: Case of Measles Vaccination Coverage in India," Artha Vijnana, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, vol. 55(1), pages 56-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:gok:arviv1:v:55:y:2013:i:1:p:56-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gok:arviv1:v:55:y:2013:i:1:p:56-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gipepin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.