IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/soaktu/v27y2008i1p67-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cleavages and Voter Mobilization in Southeast Asia: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Ufen

Abstract

The party systems of Indonesia and Malaysia are characterized by conflict patterns that can be analyzed with the cleavage model presented by Lipset and Rokkan. In both countries voters are mobilized on the background of fundamental divides. In Malaysia, voter mobilization takes place along these divides but also – with reference to the ruling party coalition – by means of patronage politics, the usage of state-controlled mass media, and a powerful administrative machinery. The politicization of specific conflicts has to be seen against the backdrop of reinforcing cleavages. In Indonesia, the politicization of cleavages is also important. But, in contrast to Malaysia, the divides are not so conspicuous because of cross-cutting cleavages and a tendency by political parties to form cartels. Political platforms are rather nebulous and do not offer policy alternatives. Instead, the attachment to certain social milieus and ideologies are addressed. Whereas in Malaysia cleavages are clearly mirrored in the social composition of party activists and supporters, in the political platforms of parties, and the way they build coalitions, there is a disconnection in Indonesia between rhetoric and realpolitik.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Ufen, 2008. "Cleavages and Voter Mobilization in Southeast Asia: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparison," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 27(1), pages 67-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:soaktu:v:27:y:2008:i:1:p:67-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:soaktu:v:27:y:2008:i:1:p:67-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marco Bünte) or (Howard Loewen). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.