IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v44y2009i3p63-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power-Sharing, Conflict and Transition in Burundi: Twenty Years of Trial and Error

Author

Listed:
  • Stef Vandeginste

Abstract

For the past twenty years, Burundi has experimented with powersharing as an instrument of political liberalisation, democratisation and conflict resolution. This contribution analyses the different meanings the concept of power-sharing has had throughout Burundi.s recent and extremely violent political transition, in particular during the lengthy peace process. It shows how national and international actors have found inspiration in the toolbox of consociationalism to negotiate and design the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi signed in August 2000 and its posttransition Constitution. Power-sharing has been instrumental in achieving the . short-term . objective of war termination. It has also de-ethnicised political competition and reduced the (potentially) destabilising effect of elections. Measured against more ambitious state-building objectives (democracy, rule of law, accountable and effective governance), power-sharing has (so far) not been able to make a difference. Several factors and developments threaten the .survival. of the power-sharing model in Burundi.

Suggested Citation

  • Stef Vandeginste, 2009. "Power-Sharing, Conflict and Transition in Burundi: Twenty Years of Trial and Error," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 44(3), pages 63-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:63-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/afsp/article/view/192
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandeginste, Stef, 2006. "Théorie consociative et partage du pouvoir au Burundi," IOB Discussion Papers 2006.04, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vandeginste, Stef, 2016. "In need of a guardian angel: preserving the gains of the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement for Burundi," IOB Working Papers 2016.01, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:63-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.