IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v38y2003i2p197-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"No Pain No Gain". Zur Verbesserung sozialer Chancen durch das Ertragen von Schmerz

Author

Listed:
  • Anni Peller

Abstract

In every community we can find the human body as an important medium, by which affiliations are defined. For this purpose quite often procedures are used which engrave the identity of an individual in an irreversible way on his body. These painful practices are culturally specific and that's why they are valued very differently. What participants themselves regard as normal and necessary, is from an ethic point of view often devaluated as absurd and mutilating. The present analysis asks by which circumstances and for what reasons pain is intentionally caused in cultural procedures and/or is at least accepted by the participants as a concomitant. These painful procedures include rites of passage, ritual beating and cosmetic operations. For this human behaviour exists a socio-biological explanation: bearing the pain increases the attractiveness of the individual. By obeying painful standards loyalty or maturity or beauty is expressed. Only by this means a normal social career is possible for the individual in her/his own society and/ or her/his chances on the market are improved. By the way of conclusion the evaluated comparison wants to show that it is exactly for these reasons that painful physical modifications are generally used and also tolerated by communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anni Peller, 2003. ""No Pain No Gain". Zur Verbesserung sozialer Chancen durch das Ertragen von Schmerz," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(2), pages 197-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:38:y:2003:i:2:p:197-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:38:y:2003:i:2:p:197-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.