IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v36y2001i3p347-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Berseba captaincy after 1938. Collective identity and conflict in a traditional community in southern Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Reinhart Kössler

Abstract

The deposition of Berseba's last Kaptein Diederik Goliath in 1938 marks the high point of an enduring conflict within the /Hai-/khaua, the only Nama group to have preserved their territory more or less intact throughout the colonial period. After 1938, enhanced administrative penetration ensued by the South African colonial authorities. Confronted with this, /Hai-/khaua collective identity was articulated in endeavours to safeguard the territory and in demands for the captaincy to be reconstituted. The implementation of the homeland policy in its Namibian version, marked by the Odendaal Plan, helped to resuscitate internal conflict in Berseba from the mid-1960s onwards. Now, the ensuing realignment of the opposing groups took on also a party political colouring, as national politics became more influential. The situation was exacerbated by fresh interventions of the South African occupying power. Internal conflict, which can also be seen as a development blockade, has not been resolved even today, although recently, there are tendencies to reach a settlement. At the same time, though the prism of intra-communal conflict, the resilience of this Nama community, against all pessimistic prognoses, may be gauged.

Suggested Citation

  • Reinhart Kössler, 2001. "The Berseba captaincy after 1938. Collective identity and conflict in a traditional community in southern Namibia," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 36(3), pages 347-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:347-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:347-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.