IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v36y2001i3p319-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zanzibar - Krise und (k)ein Ende. Kann ein Abkommen mit der Opposition den politischen Stillstand beenden?

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Hirschler

Abstract

On October 10th, 2001 Zanzibar's main opposition party CUF and the ruling CCM signed a peace accord to overcome the political impasse on the islands. A similar accord, brokered by the Commonwealth secretariat, had been signed three years before. But the agreement of 1999 was never put into practice, because the ruling party lacked the political will to do so. This article argues that the implementation of the 2001 agreement is more likely than that of it's predecessor. The escalation of violence on Pemba Island in January 2001, which followed the heavily disputed elections of October 2000, had completely changed the situation. There is serious internal and external pressure to introduce political reforms and even to share power in Zanzibar. If fully accomplished, the agreement will not only provide the framework and the instruments for democratic reforms in Zanzibar, but will possibly enhance democracy on the mainland. But the first steps of implementation of the new agreement have already indicated some of the major problems of the political systems of Zanzibar and Tanzania: The weakness of the legal institutions and the dependence of political reform on the former state party's resolve to make them a success.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Hirschler, 2001. "Zanzibar - Krise und (k)ein Ende. Kann ein Abkommen mit der Opposition den politischen Stillstand beenden?," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 36(3), pages 319-346.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:319-346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:36:y:2001:i:3:p:319-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.