IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v34y1999i2p213-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"A showcase for experiments": Local government reforms in colonial Tanzania, 1940s and 1950s

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Eckert

Abstract

This article attempts to historicise the current debates about decentralisation and "good local government" on the basis of a concrete example. It focuses on local government reforms in two areas (Sukumaland, Kilimanjaro) in late colonial Tanzania. In the 1940s and 1950s, the then British colonies in Africa experienced a wave of local government reforms, intended as steps towards political modernisation and more effective rule. The late colonial period, characterised by permanent experiments and considerable amorphousness on the part of the British colonial rulers, can be seen as the first phase of a process which started in the 1940s, continued after independence and is still relevant today. This process is influenced by ongoing but often inconsistent and rapidly changing efforts towards decentralisation on the part of the rulers. Since the late 1940s, the local population in various areas of Tanzania had to realise that despite different rulers, programs, concepts, labels and ideological justifications, local government was never really autonomous but always remained the extended arm of the central government. The conflicts between nominal participation in self-government and administrative control "from above" were never solved.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Eckert, 1999. ""A showcase for experiments": Local government reforms in colonial Tanzania, 1940s and 1950s," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 34(2), pages 213-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:34:y:1999:i:2:p:213-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:34:y:1999:i:2:p:213-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.