IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gig/afjour/v33y1998i3p311-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Stool rights" and modern land law in Ghana: A geographical perspective on the transformation of tradition

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Hammer

Abstract

The article presents a geographical approach to land related conflicts in the context of changing attitudes concerning "tradition" in Africa. An analysis of historical developments in southern Ghana and elements from a case study in western Accra are used to present conflicts that arise from the spatial superimposition of claims and land use by different actors on the scale levels of the state, the stools, local government and the neighbourhood itself. The geographical approach presented here focuses on the spatial interpretation of claims and the changing ways "tradition" is expounded and practised. The article concludes that a formerly established hypothesis concerning the correspondence of actors, their scale-level of action and spatial outcome of their action is not valid anymore. "Traditions", today, are used by all actors, independent of their original scale level of operation. "Tradition" is thus used as a quarry. The deconstruction of normative systems is, however, not the only effect. In the long run this process will lead to emerging pluralistic forms of such regulating systems. These have, today, not yet replaced the consensus which has broken down in the past.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Hammer, 1998. ""Stool rights" and modern land law in Ghana: A geographical perspective on the transformation of tradition," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 33(3), pages 311-338.
  • Handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:33:y:1998:i:3:p:311-338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doss, Cheryl & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2020. "Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gig:afjour:v:33:y:1998:i:3:p:311-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andreas Mehler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dueiide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.