IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v7y2026i7p117-d1986726.html

Oil-Spill Damage Valuation for Regional Sustainability Transitions in the Russian North: A Modular Institutional Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ruslan Ya. Bajbulatov

    (Scientific and Educational Center, Institute of Nature and Technical Sciences, Surgut State University, Surgut 628412, Russia)

  • Oleg S. Sutormin

    (Scientific and Educational Center, Institute of Nature and Technical Sciences, Surgut State University, Surgut 628412, Russia
    Department of Biophysics, School of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk 660041, Russia)

  • Marina I. Imamverdieva

    (Department of Public, Municipal Management and Human Resource Management, Institute of Economics and Management, Surgut State University, Surgut 628412, Russia)

  • Oksana L. Chulanova

    (Department of Public, Municipal Management and Human Resource Management, Institute of Economics and Management, Surgut State University, Surgut 628412, Russia)

Abstract

Environmental damage assessment has become an important institutional component of regional sustainability transitions, especially in resource-dependent northern territories where industrial risks, fragile ecosystems, sparse monitoring networks, and limited institutional capacity intersect. Existing oil-spill valuation approaches provide well-developed legal, economic, and ecosystem-service tools; however, their use as decision-support instruments for compensation governance, prevention investment, monitoring design, and regional resilience policy remains insufficiently operationalized. This article addresses this gap by developing a modular institutional framework for selecting and combining established environmental damage valuation methods under the ecological, legal, data-related, and socio-cultural constraints of the Russian North. The study applies a transparent narrative methodological review and framework-building design based on international and Russian literature, official regulatory sources, natural-resource damage assessment practice, ecosystem-service valuation studies, and publicly available evidence on the 2020 Norilsk diesel fuel spill. The analysis organizes six established valuation approaches into three complementary modules: direct harm, indirect and opportunity-related losses, and non-market ecosystem-service losses. The Norilsk case is used as an illustrative plausibility check rather than a full empirical recalculation. It shows that legally recognized compensation can provide a liability signal, but indirect losses and ecosystem-service components require separate evidence, sensitivity analysis, and double-counting control. The contribution of the article is to adapt established valuation methods into a transparent decision-support protocol that links environmental liability, compensation governance, prevention, monitoring, institutional resilience and regional sustainability transitions in Arctic and sub-Arctic resource regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruslan Ya. Bajbulatov & Oleg S. Sutormin & Marina I. Imamverdieva & Oksana L. Chulanova, 2026. "Oil-Spill Damage Valuation for Regional Sustainability Transitions in the Russian North: A Modular Institutional Framework," World, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:7:p:117-:d:1986726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/7/7/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/7/7/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:7:p:117-:d:1986726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.