Author
Listed:
- Oksana Liashenko
(Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Voli Ave, 13, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine
Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)
- Olena Mykhailovska
(Faculty of Economics and Management, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Mala Shyianovska Str., 2, 01011 Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Bogdan Adamyk
(Aston Business School, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK)
- Liudmyla Ladonko
(Faculty of Preschool, Primary Education and Arts, T.H. Shevchenko National University “Chernihiv Colegium”, Hetmana Polubotka Str., 53, 14000 Chernihiv, Ukraine)
- Grygoriy Starchenko
(NGO “Research and Educational Innovation Centre of Social Transformations”, Sobornosti Str., 4A, Office 34, 14032 Chernihiv, Ukraine)
- Anastasiia Duka
(NGO “Research and Educational Innovation Centre of Social Transformations”, Sobornosti Str., 4A, Office 34, 14032 Chernihiv, Ukraine)
- Maksym Urakin
(Faculty of Economics, Social Technologies and Tourism, Academy of Labour, Social Relations and Tourism, Kiltseva Droha, 3-A, 03187 Kyiv, Ukraine)
Abstract
This study examines whether economic diplomacy—proxied by KOF-based indicators of political globalisation and economic policy openness—is associated with multidimensional sustainable development (SD) across 208 countries over the period 2000–2023. Using two-way fixed-effects panel models with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, complemented by instrumental-variable and dynamic panel checks, we find a positive but modest within-country association between diplomatic embeddedness and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) performance. The association is driven primarily by political globalisation—reflecting diplomatic networks, international organisation membership, and treaty engagement—rather than trade policy openness. De facto integration exhibits stronger links to SDG outcomes than de jure policy indicators. The relationship is concave, with diminishing marginal returns beyond a diplomacy proxy value of approximately 60. A latent-class framework identifies two institutional archetypes: the association is more pronounced and robust under stronger governance (71 countries), while it attenuates under weaker governance (85 countries). Goal-level estimates reveal systematic trade-offs—gains in inequality reduction (SDG 10) and innovation (SDG 9) alongside adverse associations with climate outcomes (SDG 13)—and a structural breakpoint around 2017 consistent with the onset of slowbalisation. The results suggest that diplomacy can support SD, but its payoff depends on governance capacity and the management of cross-goal externalities.
Suggested Citation
Oksana Liashenko & Olena Mykhailovska & Bogdan Adamyk & Liudmyla Ladonko & Grygoriy Starchenko & Anastasiia Duka & Maksym Urakin, 2026.
"Globalisation and Sustainable Development: How Economic Diplomacy Shapes SDG Performance Across Countries and Time,"
World, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-36, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:4:p:64-:d:1917006
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:4:p:64-:d:1917006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.