IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v7y2026i3p46-d1892442.html

Care Partner Physical Activity Attitudes and Practices on Perceived Physical Activity Benefits for Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Oluwaseun Adeyemi

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Tracy Chippendale

    (Department of Occupational Therapy, New York University Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY 10003, USA)

  • Gbenga Ogedegbe

    (Institute for Excellence in Health Equity, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA)

  • Joshua Chodosh

    (Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA)

  • Dowin Boatright

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
    Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA)

Abstract

Background: Care partners play a critical role in supporting physical activity among older adults. This study assesses how care partners’ attitudes to and engagement in physical activity relate to their perceived benefits of physical activity for older adults. Methods: For this cross-sectional study, 305 care partners completed validated surveys on the perceived benefits of physical activities among older adults (outcome), attitudes towards, and practices of physical activities (predictors). For all three surveys, higher scores indicate greater perceived benefit, more positive attitudes, and greater engagement in physical activities. We assessed the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables using multivariable quantile regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, caregiving, and health-related covariates. We reported the adjusted median difference (aMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The population was predominantly young adults (18–34 years, 58%), female (53%), who had been providing caregiving services for three or more years (43%). The median perceived physical activity benefit for older adults, personal attitude toward physical activity, and physical activity practice scale scores were 60.0 (52.0–66.0), 29.0 (25.0–33.0), and 33.0 (28.0–39.0), respectively. After adjusting for covariates, a unit increase in both attitude towards physical activity (aMD: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.96–1.33) and physical activity practice (aMD: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45–0.75) was associated with increased median score of perceived benefit of physical activity among older adults. Conclusions: Care partners with positive attitudes and greater engagement in their personal physical activity perceive physical activities as beneficial for older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Oluwaseun Adeyemi & Tracy Chippendale & Gbenga Ogedegbe & Joshua Chodosh & Dowin Boatright, 2026. "Care Partner Physical Activity Attitudes and Practices on Perceived Physical Activity Benefits for Older Adults," World, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:46-:d:1892442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/7/3/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/7/3/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:46-:d:1892442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.