Author
Listed:
- Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Athanasia Manthati
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Eriada Canaj
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Eleni Gogou
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Anthimia Batrinou
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
- Irini F. Strati
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of West Attica, Agiou Spyridonos, 12243 Athens, Greece)
Abstract
Household food waste constitutes a major sustainability challenge with worldwide implications. In the current study, an online survey (N = 252) was developed to explore how routine food management practices in Greek households influence food waste. The survey was combined with a Social Practice Theory (SPT) framework and an exploratory high-school educational intervention (N = 27) with app-based diary tracking. Under the context of SPT, indices for meanings (MNG), competencies (CPT) and materiality (MAT) were constructed, along with a Food Waste Frequency (FWF) index. Respondents were highly willing to follow educational advice (87.3%) but more moderately open to using a food-tracking app (48.1%). FWF index results (M = 2.01, SD = 0.64) suggested that household food waste was present but not established as a daily routine of the participants. Pearson’s correlations and hierarchical regression of SPT indices and FWF showed that MNG were the main predictor of household FWF (R 2 = 0.38), with CPT providing a marginal contribution. Also, a positive correlation (r = 0.619, p < 0.01) was observed between FWF and MNG. The results from the food waste tracking app showed that legumes (14.6%), vegetable peel (14.6%), and meat (12.5%) were the most frequently discarded food categories and that 56.3% of the discarded food was used for animal feed. However, a decrease in the use of the application was observed after the second week. The results highlight the need for prevention policies that focus on practice configurations (i.e., MNG, CPT, and MAT). The current study operationalizes key SPT elements as measurable indices for quantitative analysis on these practice-based aspects.
Suggested Citation
Panagiota-Kyriaki Revelou & Athanasia Manthati & Eriada Canaj & Eleni Gogou & Anthimia Batrinou & Irini F. Strati, 2026.
"Investigating Household Food Waste Behaviors: A Social Practice Theory-Based Survey Combined with an Educational Intervention,"
World, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:42-:d:1882535
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:7:y:2026:i:3:p:42-:d:1882535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.