IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i4p168-d1819326.html

Multi-Objective Optimization of Socio-Ecological Systems for Global Warming Mitigation

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Tenoch Rodriguez-Gonzalez

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, Av. Adolfo López Mateos 1801 Ote., Bona Gens, Aguascalientes C.P. 20256, Mexico
    Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (SECIHTI), Ciudad de Mexico 03940, Mexico)

  • Alejandro Orozco-Calvillo

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, Av. Adolfo López Mateos 1801 Ote., Bona Gens, Aguascalientes C.P. 20256, Mexico)

  • Sinue Arnulfo Tovar-Ortiz

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, Av. Adolfo López Mateos 1801 Ote., Bona Gens, Aguascalientes C.P. 20256, Mexico)

  • Elvia Ruiz-Beltrán

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, Av. Adolfo López Mateos 1801 Ote., Bona Gens, Aguascalientes C.P. 20256, Mexico)

  • Héctor Antonio Olmos-Guerrero

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Aguascalientes, Av. Adolfo López Mateos 1801 Ote., Bona Gens, Aguascalientes C.P. 20256, Mexico)

Abstract

Socio-ecological systems (SESs) exhibit nonlinear feedback across environmental, social, and economic processes, requiring integrative analytical tools capable of representing such coupled dynamics. This study presents a quantitative framework that integrates a compartmental model of a global human–ecosystem with two complementary optimization approaches (Fisher Information (FI) and Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO)) to evaluate policy strategies for sustainability. The model represents biophysical and socio-economic interactions across 15 compartments, incorporating feedback loops between greenhouse gas (GHG) accumulation, temperature anomalies, and trophic–economic dynamics. Six policy-relevant decision variables were selected (wild plant mortality, sectoral prices (agriculture, livestock, and industry), base wages, and resource productivity) and optimized under temporal (25-year) and magnitude (±10%) constraints to ensure policy realism. FI-based optimization enhances system stability, whereas the MOO framework balances environmental, social, and economic objectives using the Ideal Point Method. Both approaches prevent the systemic collapse observed in the baseline scenario. The FI and MOO strategies reduce terminal global temperature by 11.4% and 15.0%, respectively, relative to the baseline (35 °C → 31.0 °C under FI; 35 °C → 29.7 °C under MOO). Resource-use efficiency, measured through the resource requirement coefficient (λ), improves by 8–10% under MOO (0.6767 → 0.6090) and by 6–7% under FI (0.6668 → 0.6262). These outcomes offer actionable guidance for long-term climate policy at national and international scales. The MOO framework provided the most balanced outcomes, enhancing environmental and social performance while maintaining economic viability. Overall, the integration of optimization and information-theoretic approaches within SES models can support evidence-based public policy design, offering actionable pathways toward resilient, efficient, and equitable sustainability transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Tenoch Rodriguez-Gonzalez & Alejandro Orozco-Calvillo & Sinue Arnulfo Tovar-Ortiz & Elvia Ruiz-Beltrán & Héctor Antonio Olmos-Guerrero, 2025. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Socio-Ecological Systems for Global Warming Mitigation," World, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:168-:d:1819326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:168-:d:1819326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.