IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i4p151-d1791918.html

Towards Sedentarization of Cattle Farming Systems in Sudanian and Sudano-Guinean Zones of Benin: A Typological Analysis of Conflicts Between Farmers and Herders

Author

Listed:
  • Massourou Tidjani

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Alassan Assani Seidou

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Christophe Iwaka

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Abdel Raouf Adjib Agballa-Belrou

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Maximilien Azalou

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Erick Virgile Bertrand Azando

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Jacob Yabi

    (Laboratoire d’Analyse et de Recherche sur les Dynamiques Économique et Sociale (LARDES), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

  • Ibrahim Alkoiret Traore

    (Laboratoire d’Ecologie, de Santé et de Production Animales (LESPA), Faculté d’Agronomie, Université de Parakou, Parakou BP 123, Benin)

Abstract

Conflicts between farmers and herders are a persistent challenge in Sudanian and Sudano-Guinean zones of Benin, largely driven by competition over access to pastoral resources. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence, causes, and typology of such conflicts and to assess their implications for the sedentarization of cattle farming systems. Data were collected from 480 livestock farms across four municipalities (Materi and Gogounou in the Sudanian zone; Tchaourou and Djougou in the Sudano-Guinean zone) through surveys, mapping, and herd productivity assessments. Multiple Correspondence Factorial Analysis was used to classify the conflict types. The results revealed that 52.29% of herders had experienced conflicts, with a higher incidence in the Sudano-Guinean zone (36.88%). Four main categories of conflict were identified: (i) blows and injuries to people and animals (38.64%), (ii) displacement of herders and their farms (34.26%), (iii) property damage and animal slaughter (15.13%), and (iv) violent verbal altercations and animal poisoning (11.97%). These findings indicate that recurrent conflicts are accelerating the shift from transhumance towards sedentarization, underscoring the need for tailored conflict management strategies and sustainable livestock policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Massourou Tidjani & Alassan Assani Seidou & Christophe Iwaka & Abdel Raouf Adjib Agballa-Belrou & Maximilien Azalou & Erick Virgile Bertrand Azando & Jacob Yabi & Ibrahim Alkoiret Traore, 2025. "Towards Sedentarization of Cattle Farming Systems in Sudanian and Sudano-Guinean Zones of Benin: A Typological Analysis of Conflicts Between Farmers and Herders," World, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:151-:d:1791918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:151-:d:1791918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.