IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i4p137-d1768972.html

Sustainable Frugal Innovation in Cultural Heritage for the Production of Decorative Items by Adopting Digital Twin

Author

Listed:
  • Josip Stjepandić

    (PROSTEP AG, 64295 Darmstadt, Germany
    Dom Tec Adria, 22213 Pirovac, Croatia
    Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts in Diaspora and Homeland (HAZUDD), 22213 Pirovac, Croatia)

  • Andrej Bašić

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Naval Architecture, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia)

  • Martin Bilušić

    (AluTech, 22000 Šibenik, Croatia)

  • Tomislava Majić

    (Department of Business and Management, University North, 48000 Koprivnica, Croatia
    Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts in Diaspora and Homeland (HAZUDD), 22213 Pirovac, Croatia)

Abstract

Throughout history, cultural heritage has accumulated, and is often embodied in monuments, structures, and notable figures. Cultural heritage preservation and management also include digitalization, allowing tangible monuments to be managed as digital inventory with “digital twins”. This provides innovative ways to experience and interact with the real world, in particular by using modern mobile devices. The digitalization of monuments opens new ways to produce decorative items based on the shape of the monuments. Usually, decorative items are produced by craft businesses, family-run for generations, with specialized skills in metal and stone processing. We developed and tested a methodological proposal for frugal innovation: how to produce decorative items with minimal costs based on digital twins, which are particularly in demand in tourism-driven countries like Croatia. A micro-business with three employees, specializing in “metal art,” aims to innovate and expand by producing small-scale replicas of cultural heritage objects, such as busts, statues, monuments, or profiles. A method has been developed to create replicas in the desired material and at a desired scale, faithfully reproducing the original—whether based on a physical object, 3D model, or photograph. The results demonstrate that this sustainable frugal innovation can be successfully implemented using affordable tools and licenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Josip Stjepandić & Andrej Bašić & Martin Bilušić & Tomislava Majić, 2025. "Sustainable Frugal Innovation in Cultural Heritage for the Production of Decorative Items by Adopting Digital Twin," World, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:137-:d:1768972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/4/137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franck Cochoy & Christian Licoppe & Magdalena Petersson McIntyre & Niklas Sörum, 2020. "Digitalizing consumer society: equipment and devices of digital consumption," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Birte Freudenreich & Florian Lüdeke-Freund & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 3-18, September.
    3. Bill Slee & Robert Lukesch & Elisa Ravazzoli, 2022. "Social Innovation: The Promise and the Reality in Marginalised Rural Areas in Europe," World, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Zahir Barahmand & Marianne S. Eikeland, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment under Uncertainty: A Scoping Review," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Erwin Van Tuijl & Juan Carlo Intriago Zambrano & Peter Knorringa, 2024. "Increasing Or Decreasing Frugality: The Connection Between Digitalisation And Frugal Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(03n04), pages 1-27, May.
    6. Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Yongzhong Yang & Deng Jian & Imran UR Rahman & Mahdi Moudi, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Consumer Acceptance of Innovation in Handicraft Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    7. Canan M. Ozsoy & M. Pinar Mengüç, 2024. "A Transdisciplinary Approach and Design Thinking Methodology: For Applications to Complex Problems and Energy Transition," World, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Wai-Kit Ng & Fu-Tien Hsu & Cheng-Fu Chao & Chun-Liang Chen, 2023. "Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Cultural Heritage Sites: Three Destinations in East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 478-491.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongjing Chen & Xiaotong Guo, 2023. "Impact of the Digital Economy and Financial Development on Residents’ Consumption Upgrading: Evidence from Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Kim, Yeonshin & Hur, Won-Moo & Lee, Luri, 2023. "Understanding customer participation in CSR activities: The impact of perceptions of CSR, affective commitment, brand equity, and corporate reputation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Yanjie Jiang & Xiaodi Ding, 2025. "Exploring the Nexus Between Ecosystem Services and Economic Sustainability: A Stakeholder Perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3639-3658, May.
    4. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    6. Tarcia Camily Cavalcante Quezado & Nuno Fortes & William Quezado Figueiredo Cavalcante, 2022. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics on Brand Fidelity: The Importance of Brand Love and Brand Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Huafeng Zhou & Zhejian Xiong, 2025. "Navigating the Digital Frontier: Inherent Mechanisms, Challenges, and Strategies for Sports Consumption Upgrade in the Digital Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8687-8726, June.
    8. Amitava Mondal & Somnath Bauri, 2025. "Climate-related financial disclosures and firm value: evidence from India," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Anna M. Hansson & Eja Pedersen & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Stefan E. B. Weisner, 2023. "Barriers and drivers for sustainable business model innovation based on a radical farmland change scenario," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8083-8106, August.
    10. Ntsieni Ramasimu & Morengwa Jacobeth Majadibodu & Watson Ladzani, 2023. "Support from the government for SMEs in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(5), pages 381-394, July.
    11. Pengxiang Zhang & Jingtao Yi & Chao Niu & Eric Yanfei Zhao & Sali Li, 2025. "User language and cultural product innovation: insights from the global mobile gaming industry," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(8), pages 1050-1068, October.
    12. Adam Samborski, 2022. "The Energy Company Business Model and the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Merín-Rodrigáñez, Joan & Dasí, Àngels & Alegre, Joaquín & Hughes, Mathew, 2025. "Dynamic managerial capabilities for digital transformation in innovative SMEs: What are the effects on new product development performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Zichao Yang & Rongrong Pan, 2026. "Product service supply chain decision considering network externality and corporate social responsibility in digital servitization," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2311-2343, April.
    15. Evita Milana & Frank Ulrich, 2022. "Do open innovation practices in firms promote sustainability?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1718-1732, December.
    16. Fan, Yali & Wang, Ruofei & Alkaraan, Fadi & Wu, Wei, 2025. "Decoding greenwashing practices toward sustainability: The synergistic influence of governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Jonas Wirth & Mirko Schneider & Leon Hanselmann & Kira Fink & Stephan Nebauer & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2024. "An Exploratory Analysis of the Current Status and Potential of Service-Oriented and Data-Driven Business Models within the Sheet Metal Working Sector: Insights from Interview-Based Research in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Thomson, Linus & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Jovanovic, Marin, 2023. "Conceptualizing business model piloting: An experiential learning process for autonomous solutions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Ezio Micelli & Elena Ostanel & Luca Lazzarini, 2023. "“Wanna Be Provoked”: Inner Peripheries Generators of Social Innovation in the Italian Apennine," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:4:p:137-:d:1768972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.