IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v6y2025i3p101-d1704169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging-in-Place Attachment Among Older Adults in Macau’s High-Density Community Spaces: A Multi-Dimensional Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hongzhan Lai

    (Department of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Stephen Siu Yu Lau

    (Department of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China
    Department of Architecture, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China)

  • Yuan Su

    (School of Architecture and Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)

  • Chen-Yi Sun

    (Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study explores key factors influencing Aging-in-Place Attachment (AiPA) among older adults in Macau’s high-density community spaces, emphasizing interactions between the built environment, behavior, and psychology. A multidimensional framework evaluates environmental, behavioral, human-factor, and psychological contributions. A mixed-methods, multisource approach was employed. This study measured spatial characteristics of nine public spaces, conducted systematic behavioral observations, and collected questionnaire data on place attachment and aging intentions. Eye-tracking and galvanic skin response (GSR) captured visual attention and emotional arousal. Hierarchical regression analysis tested the explanatory power of each variable group, supplemented by semi-structured interviews for qualitative depth. The results showed that the physical environment had a limited direct impact but served as a critical foundation. Behavioral variables increased explanatory power (~15%), emphasizing community engagement. Human-factor data added ~4%, indicating that sensory and habitual interactions strengthen bonds. Psychological factors contributed most (~59%), confirming AiPA as a multidimensional construct shaped primarily by emotional and social connections, supported by physical and behavioral contexts. In Macau’s dense urban context, older adults’ desire to age in place is mainly driven by emotional connection and social participation, with spatial design serving as an enabler. Effective age-friendly strategies must extend beyond infrastructure upgrades to cultivate belonging and interaction. This study advances environmental gerontology and architecture theory by explaining the mechanisms of attachment in later life. Future work should explore how physical spaces foster psychological well-being and examine emerging factors such as digital and intergenerational engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongzhan Lai & Stephen Siu Yu Lau & Yuan Su & Chen-Yi Sun, 2025. "Aging-in-Place Attachment Among Older Adults in Macau’s High-Density Community Spaces: A Multi-Dimensional Empirical Study," World, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:101-:d:1704169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/3/101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/3/101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shan Lu & Wonseok Oh & Ryozo Ooka & Lijun Wang, 2022. "Effects of Environmental Features in Small Public Urban Green Spaces on Older Adults’ Mental Restoration: Evidence from Tokyo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Vanessa Burholt, 2006. "‘Adref’: Theoretical Contexts of Attachment to Place for Mature and Older People in Rural North Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(6), pages 1095-1114, June.
    3. Tine Buffel & Liesbeth De Donder & Chris Phillipson & Nico De Witte & Sarah Dury & Dominique Vert�, 2014. "Place Attachment Among Older Adults Living in Four Communities in Flanders, Belgium," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 800-822, September.
    4. Wiles, Janine L. & Allen, Ruth E.S. & Palmer, Anthea J. & Hayman, Karen J. & Keeling, Sally & Kerse, Ngaire, 2009. "Older people and their social spaces: A study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 664-671, February.
    5. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanessa Burholt, 2012. "The Dimensionality of ‘Place Attachment’ for Older People in Rural Areas of South West England and Wales," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 2901-2921, December.
    2. Shi Chen & Yi Sun & Bo Kyong Seo, 2022. "The Effects of Public Open Space on Older People’s Well-Being: From Neighborhood Social Cohesion to Place Dependence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Lingchao Meng & Kuo-Hsun Wen & Zhijie Zeng & Richard Brewin & Xiaolei Fan & Qiong Wu, 2020. "The Impact of Street Space Perception Factors on Elderly Health in High-Density Cities in Macau—Analysis Based on Street View Images and Deep Learning Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Lager Debbie & van Hoven Bettina & Meijering Louise, 2012. "Places that Matter: Place Attachment and Wellbeing of Older Antillean Migrants in the Netherlands," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 81-94, July.
    5. Liping Wang & Xiufeng Sun & Junru Yan & Meiru Xie & Hua Qin, 2025. "Quantitative Assessment of Age-Friendly Design in Mountainous Urban Community Parks Based on Nonlinear Models: An Empirical Study in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Milligan, Christine & Roberts, Celia & Mort, Maggie, 2011. "Telecare and older people: Who cares where?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 347-354, February.
    7. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land: A case study in Hunan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-97.
    8. Tianyao Zhang & Jiahui Liu & Huiwei Chen & Mee Kam Ng, 2022. "The Associations of Communal Space with Sense of Place and Mental Health in Public Housing: Evidence from Guangzhou and Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Ling Zhang & Kebin Shao & Wenfeng Tang & Stephen Siu Yu Lau & Hongzhan Lai & Yiqi Tao, 2023. "Outdoor Space Elements in Urban Residential Areas in Shenzhen, China: Optimization Based on Health-Promoting Behaviours of Older People," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Hanna Varjakoski & Samuli Koponen & Antti Kouvo & Elisa Tiilikainen, 2023. "Age Diversity in Neighborhoods—A Mixed-Methods Approach Examining Older Residents and Community Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Yuan Zheng & Bin Cheng & Letian Dong & Tianxiang Zheng & Rong Wu, 2024. "The Moderating Effect of Social Participation on the Relationship between Urban Green Space and the Mental Health of Older Adults: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Rishworth, Andrea & Elliott, Susan J., 2019. "Global environmental change in an aging world: The role of space, place and scale," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 128-136.
    13. Łaszkiewicz, Edyta & Kronenberg, Jakub & Marcińczak, Szymon, 2018. "Attached to or bound to a place? The impact of green space availability on residential duration: The environmental justice perspective," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PB), pages 309-317.
    14. Kafková Marcela Petrová & Vidovićová Lucie & Wija Petr, 2018. "Older Adults and Civic Engagement in Rural Areas of the Czech Republic," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 247-262, June.
    15. Anne Johanna Jacoba Grave & Louis Neven & Masi Mohammadi, 2023. "Elucidating and Expanding the Restorative Theory Framework to Comprehend Influential Factors Supporting Ageing-in-Place: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-30, September.
    16. Jolien Klok & Theo G. Tilburg & Bianca Suanet & Tineke Fokkema & Martijn Huisman, 2017. "National and transnational belonging among Turkish and Moroccan older migrants in the Netherlands: protective against loneliness?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 341-351, December.
    17. Keyan Chen & Yan Xu & Kaiyuan Zhan & Yangshuo Gao & Xiangcai Xie, 2024. "Exploring the Relationship between Key Perceptual Elements of Urban Secondary Wilderness and Its Restorative Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Judy Blakey & Janet Clews, 2020. "Knowing, Being and Co-Constructing an Age-Friendly Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Xialu Wu & Yu-Sheng Shen & Shenghui Cui, 2023. "Global Trends in Green Space and Senior Mental Health Studies: Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:101-:d:1704169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.