IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v1y2020i1p2-33d364654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Social Polarization and Change: Evidence from Three Recent Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Max Stephenson

    (Institute for Policy and Governance, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Beng Abella-Lipsey

    (Institute for Policy and Governance, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Lara Nagle

    (Institute for Policy and Governance, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Neda Moayerian

    (Institute for Policy and Governance, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

Abstract

This review article analyzes three major recent books (written by Robert Wuthnow, Arlie R. Hochschild, and James and Deborah Fallows, respectively) concerning ongoing political, economic and social change in United States’ rural communities to probe differing frames and claims among them. We contend these works together point to vital social and political forces that must receive increased attention if the communities they treat are to address the challenges confronting them successfully. Thereafter, we briefly and illustratively underscore the significance of these authors’ arguments using our own ongoing work in two small communities confronting catastrophic economic decline and social fissuring in Central Appalachia. Overall, we argue that an analytical approach that combines elements of Wuthnow’s sensitivity to demographic and scalar polarization and divides, coupled with Hochschild’s emphasis on opportunities to instill and call on empathetic imagination in development efforts, could assist these rural communities’ residents to understand more fully the dynamics at play within them and to craft strategies aimed at addressing those challenges. In particular, we contend that the Fallowses’ call for pragmatic interventions and partnership building must be accompanied by long-term efforts to overcome the fear engendered by the view that rural community life constitutes a consumerist zero-sum game, and the accompanying widespread belief in those jurisdictions that scapegoating and explicit or implicit racialized hierarchies represent reasonable responses to such anxieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Stephenson & Beng Abella-Lipsey & Lara Nagle & Neda Moayerian, 2020. "Community Social Polarization and Change: Evidence from Three Recent Studies," World, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:2-33:d:364654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/1/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/1/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jworld:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:2-33:d:364654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.