IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i5p865-d99233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Footprint Estimation in Fiber Optics Industry: A Case Study of OFS Fitel, LLC

Author

Listed:
  • Suresh Inakollu

    (OFS Fitel, LLC, Norcross, GA 30071, USA)

  • Randy Morin

    (OFS Fitel, LLC, Norcross, GA 30071, USA)

  • Ryan Keefe

    (OFS Fitel, LLC, Norcross, GA 30071, USA)

Abstract

Detailed carbon footprinting assignments have been on the rise in more and more major manufacturing industries. The main strength of carbon footprinting is to make product manufacturers aware of carbon emissions and understand its meaning due to perceived global warming effects. Carbon foot-printing through life-cycle assessment in conjunction with greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting is essential for identifying opportunities for environmental efficiencies. Case studies of goods that require more complex production elements have also been increasing, like optical fiber manufacturing. From making ultra-pure glass rods to elongating hot fibers, the whole process involves using a high volume of chemicals and extensive energy. Hence, standard numbers addressing carbon footprinting specifically for fiber optics is helpful for the quantification of greenhouse gas intensity, mitigation of global warming, and adaptation against future climate change scenarios. This paper calculates and helps standardize the emission factor for the production of optical fiber from the scope of gate-to-gate: 4.81 tonnes CO 2 eq per million meters of produced fiber (which is 72.92 kg CO 2 eq per kg of produced fiber) in order to allow other industries to use this information in their own carbon footprint calculations. Since governmental regulatory agencies have largely failed to confront the risks associated with climate change borne by industries, it is essential for all industries to disclose their emissions in a standardized and comparable form in order to develop standard guidelines for all. This paper provides a practical life-cycle approach, concludes with requirements for further research and evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Suresh Inakollu & Randy Morin & Ryan Keefe, 2017. "Carbon Footprint Estimation in Fiber Optics Industry: A Case Study of OFS Fitel, LLC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:865-:d:99233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/865/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/865/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:865-:d:99233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.