IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2016i1p46-d86475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experiences of Mass Pig Carcass Disposal Related to Groundwater Quality Monitoring in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng-Yei Hseu

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

  • Zueng-Sang Chen

    (Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan)

Abstract

The pig industry is the most crucial animal industry in Taiwan; 10.7 million pigs were reared for consumption in 1996. A foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic broke out on 19 March 1997, and 3,850,536 pigs were culled before July in the same year. The major disposal method of pig carcasses from the FMD outbreak was burial, followed by burning and incineration. To investigate groundwater quality, environmental monitoring of burial sites was performed from October 1997 to June 1999; groundwater monitoring of 90–777 wells in 20 prefectures was performed wo to six times in 1998. Taiwanese governmental agencies analyzed 3723 groundwater samples using a budget of US $1.5 million. The total bacterial count, fecal coliform, Salmonella spp., nitrite-N, nitrate-N, ammonium-N, sulfate, non-purgeable organic carbon, total oil, and total dissolved solid were recognized as indicators of groundwater contamination resulting from pig carcass burial. Groundwater at the burial sites was considered to be contaminated on the basis of the aforementioned indicators, particularly groundwater at burial sites without an impermeable cloth and those located at a relatively short distance from the monitoring well. The burial sites selected during outbreaks in Taiwan should have a low surrounding population, be away from water preservation areas, and undergo regular monitoring of groundwater quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng-Yei Hseu & Zueng-Sang Chen, 2016. "Experiences of Mass Pig Carcass Disposal Related to Groundwater Quality Monitoring in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:46-:d:86475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/46/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/46/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:46-:d:86475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.