IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i6p7232-7244d50680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fitting the Stocking Rate with Pastoral Resources to Manage and Preserve Mediterranean Forestlands: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Bianchetto

    (Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria—Agrobiology and Pedology Research Centre (CRA-ABP), Piazza Massimo d'Azeglio 30, 50121 Firenze, Italy)

  • Ivan Buscemi

    (Agricultural and Forest Sciences Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed.4, Ingr. H, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Piermaria Corona

    (Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria—Forestry Research Centre (CRA-SEL), viale Santa Margherita 80, 52100 Arezzo, Italy)

  • Giovanni Giardina

    (Agricultural and Forest Sciences Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed.4, Ingr. H, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Tommaso La Mantia

    (Agricultural and Forest Sciences Department, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed.4, Ingr. H, 90128 Palermo, Italy)

  • Salvatore Pasta

    (Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Council of Research (IBBR-CNR), Unit of Palermo, Corso Calatafimi n° 414, 90129 Palermo, Italy)

Abstract

Pasture practices have affected Mediterranean forest ecosystems for millennia, and they are still quite widespread in mountainous areas. Nevertheless, in the last decades, the stability of forest ecosystems has been jeopardized due to the abandonment of traditional agro-pastoral practices, so that the gradual reduction of open areas due to progressive succession processes has caused a high increase of grazing pressure by livestock and wild ungulates feeding on forest areas. This paper aims at showing a methodological approach for evaluating the effect of applying measures in order to improve the grazing value of grasslands and ecotonal patches and lower the grazing impact on native woodlands. A protected area in Sicily (Italy) is considered as a representative case study. The analysis of remotely sensed imagery and several field surveys enabled to identify and map six different land use units subject to grazing, i.e. , (1) forests; (2) grasslands (pastures dominated by palatable herbs and grasses); (3) overgrazed grasslands (dominated by poisonous and/or thorny herbs and forbs, not palatable); (4) encroached pastures; (5) roadside firebreaks (dominated by palatable herbs) with no shrubs; and (6) wooded/ encroached roadside firebreaks. Several data were collected through sample plots selected within each land use unit, in order to assess their pastoral value. These data have been used to define current and optimal animal stock rates aiming at addressing pasture management planning towards a sustainable use of forestland and shrubland.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Bianchetto & Ivan Buscemi & Piermaria Corona & Giovanni Giardina & Tommaso La Mantia & Salvatore Pasta, 2015. "Fitting the Stocking Rate with Pastoral Resources to Manage and Preserve Mediterranean Forestlands: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:6:p:7232-7244:d:50680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zefu Gao & Qinyu Zhu & Haicheng Tao & Yiwen Jiao, 2023. "Grassland Health in Xilin Gol League from the Perspective of Machine Learning—Analysis of Grazing Intensity on Grassland Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:6:p:7232-7244:d:50680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.