IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i11p15319-15341d59051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Potential Unstable Sites and Stable Sites on Revegetated Cut-Slopes of Mountainous Terrain in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Ho Kil

    (Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Dong Kun Lee

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Agriculture & Life Science, Seoul National University, San 56-1 Sillim-Dong, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-743, Korea)

  • Ho Gul Kim

    (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-743, Korea)

  • Nam-Choon Kim

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Bio-Resources Science, Dankook University, Cheonan 330-714, Korea)

  • Sangjun Im

    (Department of Forest Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-743, Korea)

  • Gwan-Soo Park

    (Department of Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Korea)

Abstract

This study employs a diverse set of variables to explain slope stabilization on stable versus failure-prone revegetated cut-slopes in Korea. A field survey was conducted at potential unstable sites and stable sites using 23 variables. Through a non-parametric test of the field survey results, 15 variables were identified as primary determinants of slope failure. Of these variables, one described physical characteristics (elapsed year); four variables described vegetation properties (plant community, vegetation coverage rate, number of trees, and number of herbs); and 10 variables represented soil properties (porosity, soil hardness, water content, sand ratio and silt ratio of soil texture, tensile strength, permeability coefficient, soil depth, soil acidity, salt concentration, and organic matter). Slope angle, which was mainly considered in previous studies, of variables in physical characteristics was not statistically selected as one of the 15 variables because most of sites were located on steep slopes. The vegetation community, vegetation coverage, and number of trees influence slope stabilization. Vegetation coverage is highly correlated with other soil and vegetation variables, making it a major indicator of slope stabilization. All soil variables were related to slope failure such that subsequent slope failure was related to the method of slope revegetation rather than the environmental condition of the slope. Slope failure did not occur in revegetated slopes that matched the characteristics of the surrounding landscape and contained a large number of native trees. Most soil and vegetation variables showed differing values for whether a revegetated slope is potentially unstable or stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Ho Kil & Dong Kun Lee & Ho Gul Kim & Nam-Choon Kim & Sangjun Im & Gwan-Soo Park, 2015. "Comparing Potential Unstable Sites and Stable Sites on Revegetated Cut-Slopes of Mountainous Terrain in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15319-15341:d:59051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jamal Jokar Arsanjani & Eric Vaz, 2017. "Special Issue Editorial: Earth Observation and Geoinformation Technologies for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-5, May.
    2. Ho Gul Kim & Dong Kun Lee & Huicheul Jung & Sung-Ho Kil & Jin Han Park & Chan Park & Riwako Tanaka & Changwan Seo & Ho Kim & Wooseok Kong & Kyusik Oh & Jinyong Choi & Young-Ju Oh & Gangseok Hwang & Ch, 2016. "Finding key vulnerable areas by a climate change vulnerability assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(3), pages 1683-1732, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15319-15341:d:59051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.