IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v2y2009i1p73-91d6663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic Obstacles to Establishing a Participatory Plant Breeding Program for Organic Growers in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Mendum

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Leland L. Glenna

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

Abstract

Proponents of participatory plant breeding (PPB) contend that it is more conducive to promoting agricultural biodiversity than conventional plant breeding. The argument is that conventional plant breeding tends to produce crops for homogenous environments, while PPB tends to be directed at meeting the diverse environmental conditions of the farmers participating in a breeding program. Social scientific research is needed to highlight the complex socioeconomic factors that inhibit efforts to initiate PPB programs. To contribute, we offer a case study of a participatory organic seed production project that involved a university breeding program, commercial organic seed dealers, and organic farmers in the Northeastern United States. We demonstrate that, although PPB may indeed promote agricultural biodiversity, several socioeconomic obstacles must be overcome to establish such a program.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Mendum & Leland L. Glenna, 2009. "Socioeconomic Obstacles to Establishing a Participatory Plant Breeding Program for Organic Growers in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:73-91:d:6663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/1/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/1/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:73-91:d:6663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.