Author
Listed:
- Houbo Zhou
(State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Qiuli Lv
(State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Jinghui Wei
(College of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
The Academy of Digital China (Fujian), Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China)
- Yangmingxin Tan
(School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Hubei Habitat Environment Research Centre of Engineering and Technology, Wuhan 430072, China)
- Longyu Shi
(State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China)
Abstract
Urban green sustainable development has become a key pathway for achieving high-quality regional growth under intensifying climate change and resource constraints. However, SDG-oriented localized assessments at the urban scale remain limited, particularly in identifying key factors and nonlinear relationships underlying multi-system coordination. This study develops an evaluation framework integrating the sustainable development goals (SDGs) with China’s new development philosophy, following a coordinated pathway of pollution reduction, carbon mitigation, green development, and economic growth. Using nine cities in the Pearl River Delta, we assess the spatiotemporal dynamics of green development and coordination, and apply explainable machine learning (SHAP) to identify key influencing factors and their nonlinear effects. The results show that the overall level of urban green development increased from 45.22 in 2015 to 55.54 in 2022. Innovation, green, and sharing subsystems exhibited the most significant growth, whereas the openness subsystem declined after 2019. Spatially, a clear core–transition–periphery structure emerged, with coordination levels decreasing from southeast coastal to northwest inland areas. SHAP-based analysis further reveals that innovation and openness dominate the explanation of coordination differences, jointly accounting for 77.95% of total feature importance. Moreover, key drivers exhibit pronounced nonlinear patterns characterized by threshold effects and diminishing marginal returns. Specifically, marginal contributions are weak or negative at lower levels, become positive after crossing empirical thresholds, and gradually attenuate or stabilize at higher levels. This study advances SDG-oriented urban assessment and provides robust evidence of nonlinear and context-dependent drivers of coordinated urban green development.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4619-:d:1936584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.