IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4606-d1936442.html

Fluoride Enrichment and Health Risks in the Aksu River Basin Oasis: Implications for Soil–Groundwater Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Quan Xu

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Urumqi Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Urumqi 830057, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Engineering Technology Research Center for Saline Water Utilization, Urumqi 830057, China)

  • Jianjun Yang

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Mengting Jin

    (Urumqi Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Urumqi 830057, China
    Xinjiang Engineering Technology Research Center for Saline Water Utilization, Urumqi 830057, China)

  • Xingxing Duan

    (Urumqi Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Urumqi 830057, China
    Xinjiang Engineering Technology Research Center for Saline Water Utilization, Urumqi 830057, China)

  • Peng Guo

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi 830023, China)

Abstract

The Aksu River Basin oasis, a typical arid ecological environment, faces considerable ecological and public health risks from fluoride accumulation in soil and groundwater. However, systematic investigations integrating soil–groundwater co-enrichment mechanisms with multi-pathway health risk assessments under environmentally relevant conditions remain scarce. We examined spatial fluoride distribution in the soil–groundwater system, associated health risks, and key driving mechanisms. Based on 2009 soil and 264 groundwater samples, we applied radial basis function (RBF) interpolation, Getis-Ord G i * hotspot analysis, the geo-accumulation index (I geo ), the ecological risk index (ER), and the U.S. EPA health risk assessment model to evaluate pollution levels, ecological risks, and health impacts on adults and children. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed relationships with 12 environmental factors, including topography, climate, soil properties, and vegetation. Key results are as follows: (1) High-fluoride soils (>700 mg·kg −1 ) clustered in the eastern basin, while groundwater fluoride increased along a west–east gradient, with RBF interpolation yielding the highest accuracy; (2) soil fluoride was generally “unpolluted–moderate risk” (mean I geo = −0.14, ER = 1.40), whereas groundwater posed the primary health risk, with a mean hazard quotient of 1.83 for children via drinking water, indicating non-carcinogenic risk; (3) soil enrichment was driven by evaporation–concentration–alkaline activation, while groundwater enrichment followed a convergence–concentration–evaporation mechanism, being negatively correlated with elevation. Groundwater fluoride presents a clear health risk, particularly to children, arising from high geological background levels and intense evaporation. Managing fluoride pollution and safeguarding drinking water quality in arid oasis regions is consequential. These findings provide a scientific basis for sustainable groundwater management and public health protection in arid oases.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan Xu & Jianjun Yang & Mengting Jin & Xingxing Duan & Peng Guo, 2026. "Fluoride Enrichment and Health Risks in the Aksu River Basin Oasis: Implications for Soil–Groundwater Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4606-:d:1936442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4606/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4606/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4606-:d:1936442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.