Author
Listed:
- Yue Sui
(School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)
- Xiaohu Zhou
(School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)
- Hui Zhang
(School of Management, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)
- Yucai Jia
(School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)
Abstract
As organizations globally pursue the twin transitions of digitalization and sustainability, whether digital tools inherently facilitate green objectives remains a critical debate. Drawing on Social Information Processing (SIP) theory, this study develops an affective–cognitive dual-path model, examining how perceived leader prosocial motivation catalyzes employees’ green innovation intention. Utilizing a mixed-methods design in China, we first conducted a scenario-based experiment (Study 1, N = 184) to establish internal validity, followed by a two-wave, multi-source field survey (Study 2, N = 428) across diverse industries to enhance ecological validity. Regression analyses confirm that perceived leader prosocial motivation positively relates to employees’ green innovation intentions. This relationship is mediated by green organizational identity and green mindfulness, underscoring the pivotal role of individual affective and cognitive factors in translating organizational green visions into employee innovation. Crucially, we reveal a critical signal interference effect: high workplace digitalization acts as a negative boundary condition that weakens the positive influence of leader motivation. Our findings highlight the necessity for leaders to cultivate and signal prosocial motivation to effectively inspire employees’ green innovation intentions. Furthermore, our study challenges the synergy myth of the twin transition. We provide critical insights for digital governance by revealing that excessive digital embedding can trigger cognitive overload and attention fragmentation among employees, ultimately stifling the organizational green transition.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4600-:d:1936336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.