Author
Listed:
- Katarzyna Pietrucha-Urbanik
(Faculty of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-029 Rzeszow, Poland)
- Janusz R. Rak
(Faculty of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Rzeszow University of Technology, 35-029 Rzeszow, Poland)
Abstract
Water utilities are increasingly expected to combine technical reliability with social inclusion, risk communication, and service continuity. This empirical paper reports a cross-sectional mixed-mode household survey conducted in Rzeszów, Poland, based on 384 complete questionnaire records. For a city of approximately 200,000 inhabitants, this sample size matched the conventional planning benchmark associated with a 95% confidence level and a 5% maximum error under simple-random-sampling assumptions; however, because recruitment was mixed-mode and non-probabilistic, the results are interpreted as evidence from the realized sample rather than as formally weighted population estimates. The questionnaire covered routine service evaluation, interruption experience, preparedness, communication preferences, vulnerability-related burden, and willingness to support reliability enhancement. The analytical workflow combined descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, Bartlett’s test of sphericity, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure, principal component analysis, Mann–Whitney U tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests, chi-square tests, Spearman correlation, binary logistic regression, correspondence analysis, and CHAID-type segmentation. The highest ratings were recorded for continuity of supply (mean = 4.18) and pressure stability (mean = 4.15), whereas price fairness received the lowest mean score (3.17). Interruptions were reported by 40.1% of respondents and were associated with lower overall satisfaction. Logistic regression showed that continuity rating (OR = 4.029) and water quality rating (OR = 2.305) increased the odds of high satisfaction, whereas longer interruptions reduced them (OR = 0.354). Additional analyses showed that interruptions lasting 12 h or more markedly increased the odds of high nuisance among affected households (OR = 5.914), while respondents aged 51 years or more had lower odds of declaring emergency-information awareness (OR = 0.468). Internal bootstrap validation indicated only mild optimism (optimism-corrected AUC = 0.825). The findings indicate that customer satisfaction in urban water services is shaped primarily by continuity, perceived water quality, and disruption burden, while communication and preparedness needs remain socially differentiated.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4588-:d:1936331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.