IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4585-d1936467.html

Energy Potential of Silver Fir and Norway Spruce Trees Affected by Dieback

Author

Listed:
  • Branko Ursić

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 23, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Mihael Lovrinčević

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 23, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ivan Žarković

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 23, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • David Janeš

    (Forest Administration Office Delnice, Croatian Forests Ltd., Supilova 32, 51 300 Delnice, Croatia)

  • Andreja Đuka

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 23, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Dinko Vusić

    (University of Zagreb Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Svetošimunska cesta 23, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

This paper examines the energy potential of silver fir ( Abies alba Mill) and Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst) trees across three tree crown defoliation degrees (TCDDs): healthy, severely defoliated (61–99%) and dead. The study was conducted in the area of the Forest Administration Delnice, Management Unit »Milanov vrh«, in the Republic of Croatia. Field measurements were conducted on 83 silver fir trees and 114 Norway spruce trees to determine the mass of live and dead branches per tree and to collect samples of wood, bark, main live and dead branches, and side live and dead branches (in total, 813) for further laboratory analyses. Further, differences in wood basic density, moisture content, ash content, net calorific value, and carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur content across TCDD classes were also determined. For both tree species, wood basic density across TCDDs decreased as follows: severely defoliated trees > healthy trees > dead trees. Regression analyses showed that the largest masses of branches occurred on healthy silver fir trees ( R 2 = 0.48), followed by severely defoliated ( R 2 = 0.41) and dead trees ( R 2 = 0.46). The same trend in determined total branch mass per tree was observed for Norway spruce trees, where the coefficient of determination was highest for dead trees ( R 2 = 0.72), followed by severely defoliated ( R 2 = 0.69) and healthy ( R 2 = 0.61) trees. A negative correlation between moisture content and TCDD class was observed for wood, bark, and live branches. The highest net calorific value was found for side live branches for both researched species, and only the net calorific value of side live branches of Norway spruce was statistically significantly different across TCDD classes. Overall, this study showed a negative impact of TCDD on the amount of available tree residues (branches) that could be utilized as a solid biofuel. Furthermore, the results of the laboratory analyses were ambiguous, increasing the complexity and heterogeneity of the wood material and underscoring the need for further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Branko Ursić & Mihael Lovrinčević & Ivan Žarković & David Janeš & Andreja Đuka & Dinko Vusić, 2026. "Energy Potential of Silver Fir and Norway Spruce Trees Affected by Dieback," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4585-:d:1936467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4585/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4585-:d:1936467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.