Author
Listed:
- Xiaohua Ge
(Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Taiyuan Institute of Technology, Taiyuan 030008, China)
- Lanjia Niu
(Faculty of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China)
- Yuen Zhu
(Shanxi Laboratory for Yellow River, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China)
- Jianchao Ma
(College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)
- Hua Li
(Shanxi Laboratory for Yellow River, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China)
Abstract
Against the backdrop of China’s dual carbon goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality), hydrogen energy has emerged as a key strategic priority for Shanxi’s energy transformation. Understanding the carbon emission characteristics and mitigation potential of typical hydrogen production routes is essential for guiding the low-carbon development of the local hydrogen industry. This study applies a unified life cycle assessment (LCA) framework to evaluate five representative hydrogen production routes in Shanxi. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the robustness of the results. The results show marked differences in carbon intensity across routes: large-scale integrated coal gasification hydrogen production (LICGHP, 10.02 kg CO 2 e/kg-H 2 ) > commercial coal gasification hydrogen production (CCGHP, 9.35 kg CO 2 e/kg-H 2 ) > photovoltaic hydrogen production (PHP, 6.17 kg CO 2 e/kg-H 2 ) > coke oven gas hydrogen production (COGHP, 3.83 kg CO 2 e/kg-H 2 ) > wind power hydrogen production (WPHP, 1.57 kg CO 2 e/kg-H 2 ). For coal-based routes, emissions are concentrated in the operational phase, whereas for renewable routes, emissions are concentrated in the construction phase with near-zero emissions during operation. COGHP (61.78% mitigation rate) serves as an effective transitional pathway, and WPHP (84.33% mitigation rate) represents the best low-carbon option. Mitigation strategies vary by route: coal-based routes prioritize CCS and process optimization, while renewable energy routes focus on supply chain decarbonization and green construction. These findings offer scientific support for Shanxi’s hydrogen energy technology selection and low-carbon strategy formulation.
Suggested Citation
Xiaohua Ge & Lanjia Niu & Yuen Zhu & Jianchao Ma & Hua Li, 2026.
"Life Cycle Carbon Emission Accounting and Mitigation Pathways of Typical Hydrogen Production Routes in Shanxi Province,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4570-:d:1936016
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4570-:d:1936016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.