IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4565-d1935963.html

Structural Deficiencies, Governance Challenges, and Strategies for Sustainable Seismic Resilience in Hazard-Prone Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Ayed E. Alluqmani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Al-Madinah Al-Munawarah 42351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdul Habib Zaray

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
    Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kandahar University, Kandahar 3801, Afghanistan)

  • Abdul Wahid Wahidi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Kandahar University, Kandahar 3801, Afghanistan)

  • Issa El-Hussain

    (Earthquake Monitoring Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Abdullah Ansari

    (Earthquake Monitoring Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Sruthi J.S.

    (Earthquake Monitoring Center, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Vedprakash Maralapalle

    (L. S. Raheja School of Architecture, Mumbai 400051, India)

Abstract

Afghanistan is located within one of the world’s most seismically active regions, where recurrent earthquakes pose a persistent threat to human life and the built environment. The 7 October 2023 Herat earthquake exposed critical vulnerabilities in both the construction sector and institutional frameworks, manifested through the widespread presence of non-engineered buildings, poor construction quality, and the absence of mandatory and enforceable seismic design regulations. This study examines the structural, construction-related, and governance deficiencies that significantly contributed to extensive building damage and high casualty rates, while also assessing shortcomings in public preparedness and disaster risk governance. A comparative case-study approach is adopted to evaluate seismic resilience and disaster management practices in India, Pakistan and Iran. The findings indicate that the elevated vulnerability observed in Herat primarily resulted from deficient construction practices, the lack of codified seismic standards, weak regulatory enforcement, and limited technical capacity within the construction industry. In contrast, regions characterized by well-established seismic codes, engineered structural systems, and coordinated institutional mechanisms experienced substantially reduced levels of structural damage and human losses, although earthquake impacts are also influenced by factors such as hazard characteristics, site conditions, exposure levels, and population distribution. The study highlights that seismic safety and sustainable development are inherently interdependent objectives. Improving earthquake resilience in Afghanistan requires the integration of earthquake-resistant engineering with sustainable construction practices, enhancement of technical and professional capacity, rigorous enforcement of region-specific seismic regulations, and strengthened community-based awareness programs. The adoption of internationally recognized best practices and risk-informed planning strategies is essential for fostering safer, more resilient, and environmentally sustainable urban development capable of withstanding future seismic events.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayed E. Alluqmani & Abdul Habib Zaray & Abdul Wahid Wahidi & Issa El-Hussain & Abdullah Ansari & Sruthi J.S. & Vedprakash Maralapalle, 2026. "Structural Deficiencies, Governance Challenges, and Strategies for Sustainable Seismic Resilience in Hazard-Prone Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4565-:d:1935963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4565-:d:1935963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.