IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4557-d1935810.html

Land Governance and Urban Hierarchy in China: Local Land Allocation Under Centralized Land Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Xintian Yu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
    Association of Architectural History and Architectural Heritage Protection in Jilin Province, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Hengjie Duan

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Chuanlei Qi

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Xiaoyang Tang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Yuesong Liu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Mingliang Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China
    Sub-Laboratory of Ministry of Education MOE Key Laboratory of Building Comprehensive Energy Conservation in Cold Region, Architectural and Urban-Rural Design Energy Conservation Research Center, Changchun 130118, China
    The Jilin Province Ecological Wisdom Urban Innovation and Development Strategy Research Center, Changchun 130118, China)

Abstract

China’s urban size distribution has increasingly shifted toward concentration in large cities amid global urbanization and the restructuring of urban development patterns. This trend has intensified governance and spatial pressures in major cities while exposing weaker growth momentum in small and medium-sized cities and reducing overall urban system coordination. Existing studies mainly explain this pattern through market forces such as agglomeration economies, housing prices, and migration, while others examine the consequences of local land practices from the perspectives of land finance, local competition, and institutional change. However, there is still no systematic explanation of why centrally imposed aggregate land constraints, operating through heterogeneous local land allocation, generate uneven urban outcomes. Against the background of the 2004 strict land management reform, this paper develops a theory-oriented conceptual framework linking central land constraints, local land allocation, and urban size structure. It clarifies how uniform central constraints may be translated into uneven urban outcomes through differentiated local land-allocation practices. Local land allocation is identified as the key transmission mechanism through which development opportunities are reshaped across cities and, under specific institutional conditions, the upper tiers of the urban hierarchy are reinforced. This paper therefore offers a bounded explanation of how central–local land governance shapes China’s urban size structure, while also underscoring the relevance of land governance to more balanced, resource-efficient, and sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xintian Yu & Hengjie Duan & Xin Wang & Chuanlei Qi & Xiaoyang Tang & Yuesong Liu & Mingliang Li, 2026. "Land Governance and Urban Hierarchy in China: Local Land Allocation Under Centralized Land Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4557-:d:1935810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4557-:d:1935810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.