IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4552-d1935720.html

Development and Validation of a Regionally Optimized Newmark Model for Coseismic Landslide Hazard Assessment in Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Weixin Wang

    (Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Disaster Prevention and Reduction Engineering, Sanhe 065201, China
    Langfang City Key Laboratory of Research and Application of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Xiaoguang Cai

    (Langfang City Key Laboratory of Research and Application of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure, Sanhe 065201, China
    China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Da Peng

    (Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Disaster Prevention and Reduction Engineering, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Xin Huang

    (Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Disaster Prevention and Reduction Engineering, Sanhe 065201, China
    Langfang City Key Laboratory of Research and Application of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Sihan Li

    (Institute of Disaster Prevention, College of Disaster Prevention and Reduction Engineering, Sanhe 065201, China
    Langfang City Key Laboratory of Research and Application of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure, Sanhe 065201, China
    Hebei Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Prevention and Risk Assessment, Sanhe 065201, China)

  • Honglu Xu

    (Langfang City Key Laboratory of Research and Application of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structure, Sanhe 065201, China
    China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

Regional coseismic landslide hazard assessment is important for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development in seismically active mountainous regions. Existing Newmark displacement prediction models exhibit systematic bias when applied to Southwest China due to the region’s distinctive seismotectonic and topographic characteristics. This study addresses this limitation by systematically evaluating and recalibrating seven established models using 591 horizontal strong-motion records from nine significant regional earthquakes (2007–2022). Among the recalibrated versions, the Yiğit2020 framework performed best but showed potential for further improvement. Analysis revealed a stable log-linear correlation between peak ground velocity ( PGV ) and Newmark displacement, with an average of 0.78 under different critical acceleration levels. By incorporating a log PGV term, a new model was developed, achieving improved performance with an R 2 of 0.92 and a standard deviation (σ) of 0.30. Validation results further showed that the new model reduced the mean relative error from 74.22% to 66.43% and the median relative error from 53.83% to 38.90%, compared with the recalibrated Yiğit2020 model. In a case study of the 2022 Luding Ms 6.8 earthquake, the proposed model yielded the highest landslide discrimination capability (AUC = 0.687), outperforming other models (AUC = 0.600–0.636). These results support more reliable regional hazard zoning and rapid post-earthquake risk identification, thereby contributing to sustainable land-use planning, infrastructure resilience, and disaster risk reduction in seismically active mountainous regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixin Wang & Xiaoguang Cai & Da Peng & Xin Huang & Sihan Li & Honglu Xu, 2026. "Development and Validation of a Regionally Optimized Newmark Model for Coseismic Landslide Hazard Assessment in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4552-:d:1935720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4552-:d:1935720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.