IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4545-d1935620.html

Comparative Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mulching Films

Author

Listed:
  • Domantė Lubytė

    (Center for Research on Advanced Packaging Materials and Technologies, Kaunas University of Technology, 51367 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Daina Kliaugaitė

    (Institute of Environmental Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44239 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Visvaldas Varžinskas

    (Center for Research on Advanced Packaging Materials and Technologies, Kaunas University of Technology, 51367 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Vidas Lekavičius

    (Energetikos Kompleksinių Tyrimų Laboratorija, Lithuanian Energy Institute, 44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture requires careful evaluation of crop production materials, such as conventional mulching films, which improve yields and water efficiency but raise concerns related to waste, emissions, and supply chains. Assessing sustainable alternatives is therefore essential. This study compares the environmental life cycle impacts (LCA) and social impacts (S-LCA) of three agricultural mulching films: PLA-based, PBAT-based, and conventional LDPE film. The environmental assessment reflects conditions relevant to Lithuania, while the social assessment considers production contexts in Lithuania, Poland, and China. Results show that the highest environmental impacts occur during plastic granulate production, with PBAT generating 7.3 kg CO 2 eq , compared to 1.9 kg CO 2 eq for LDPE and 1.8 kg CO 2 eq for PLA (IPCC 100a method). Social risk analysis indicates that the main risks are associated with petroleum-based materials and, in the case of PLA, corn cultivation. PBAT-based films show the highest overall environmental impact; however, their ability to degrade in soil reduces the need for collection and transport. In contrast, LDPE films require removal and waste management but may offer more favorable outcomes when managed efficiently. Overall, while bioplastics involve diverse raw materials and energy-intensive production, conventional plastics may still provide lower environmental impacts under certain conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Domantė Lubytė & Daina Kliaugaitė & Visvaldas Varžinskas & Vidas Lekavičius, 2026. "Comparative Environmental and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mulching Films," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4545-:d:1935620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4545-:d:1935620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.