IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4541-d1935550.html

Rethinking Urban Park Equity: A People-Centered Assessment of Supply–Demand Mismatch Using Mobile Phone Data

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjian Zhu

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, Shenzhen 518060, China
    Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Optimization of Built Environment, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Tianle Liao

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Bing Zeng

    (School of Economics, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, China)

  • Liang Zhu

    (College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Pengyu Chen

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science, Shenzhen 518060, China
    The Institute of Architecture Design & Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

Abstract

Whether urban park supply effectively responds to residents’ actual use remains a critical issue for public service provision, residents’ health and well-being, and spatial equity in high-density cities. Conventional assessments based on static population data may fail to capture dynamic patterns of human activity, potentially obscuring mismatches between service provision and real demand. This study integrates mobile phone signaling data into a supply–demand assessment framework to evaluate urban park systems from a dynamic population perspective. The framework is applied to Shenzhen as a representative high-density megacity. Park supply is measured by service capacity, coverage, and accessibility, while demand is derived from observed visitation behavior. A Supply–Demand Ratio (SDR) index, combined with Getis-Ord Gi* analysis, is employed to identify spatial patterns of mismatch. The results reveal substantial supply–demand imbalances that are not captured by traditional static indicators, with approximately 30.9% of communities identified as significant cold spots. High-density central areas exhibit a persistent deficit in park services despite relatively high coverage levels, whereas peripheral areas with abundant ecological resources show relative surpluses. These patterns are closely associated with urban functional structure, population mobility, and jobs–housing separation. By uncovering the divergence between nominal accessibility and actual use, this study highlights the limitations of place-based planning approaches and underscores the need for a people-centered perspective. The findings point to the importance of shifting from “opportunity equity” to “outcome equity” in evaluating and improving urban public service provision to foster sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjian Zhu & Tianle Liao & Bing Zeng & Liang Zhu & Pengyu Chen, 2026. "Rethinking Urban Park Equity: A People-Centered Assessment of Supply–Demand Mismatch Using Mobile Phone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4541-:d:1935550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4541-:d:1935550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.