Author
Listed:
- Byron Corrales
(Smart Grid Research Group GIREI, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito EC170702, Ecuador)
- Milton Ruiz
(Smart Grid Research Group GIREI, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito EC170702, Ecuador)
- Edwin Garcia
(Smart Grid Research Group GIREI, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito EC170702, Ecuador)
- Alexander Aguila Téllez
(Smart Grid Research Group GIREI, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Quito EC170702, Ecuador)
Abstract
Distribution networks are being transformed by the growing penetration of distributed generation (DG), which changes power flows, voltage profiles, and the optimal operating point of the feeder. This study proposes a hybrid technique that combines the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with a neural network (NN) surrogate model to solve the distribution network reconfiguration (DNR) problem. The method minimizes active power losses while improving voltage regulation and preserving radial operation under operational constraints. The GWO performs global exploration of discrete switch configurations, whereas the NN accelerates local refinement by screening candidates before exact AC power flow validation. This manuscript presents benchmark results for the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 69-bus distribution test systems. For the IEEE 33-bus benchmark, DG units are installed at buses 14, 25, and 30. For the IEEE 33-bus case, losses are reduced from 282.94 kW in the base case to 120.65 kW with DG and to 87.08 kW after hybrid reconfiguration, while the minimum voltage magnitude improves from 0.8829 p.u. to 0.9587 p.u. For the IEEE 69-bus case, total active losses decrease from 224.95 kW to 82.22 kW with DG and to 29.92 kW after reconfiguration while concurrently improving the voltage profile and line loading. From a sustainability perspective, the main contribution of the proposed workflow is to reduce technical losses at the distribution level, thereby improving energy efficiency for a given demand. Overall, the results show that the combined use of DG and surrogate-assisted reconfiguration can yield substantial efficiency gains across benchmark feeders of varying sizes, while broader multi-feeder validation and more detailed surrogate error quantification remain necessary before claiming general applicability.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4516-:d:1935105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.