Author
Listed:
- Jiajia Zhao
(Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
- Lixian Xie
(Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
- Ziyang Huang
(Department of Communication Design, College of Design, Graduate School of Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
In the context of the increasing digitalization of urban cultural heritage communication, public acceptance, identification, and dissemination of symbolic cultural heritage content exhibit pronounced structural differences across sustainability levels. Taking Xuzhou—a national historical and cultural city in China—as the empirical context, this study conceptualizes cultural heritage as symbolic carriers of cultural meaning and constructs a sustainability-stratified analytical framework. By integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Cultural Identity (CI) theory, and incorporating Perceived Sustainability of Cultural Heritage (PSC) and Digital Interactive Media Participation (DMP), the study develops a comprehensive model of public communication acceptance mechanisms. Based on 931 valid questionnaires collected from local residents and visitors, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, structural equation modeling (SEM), and permutation-based multi-group analysis (MGA) are employed to examine both overall behavioral pathways and cross-group structural heterogeneity across symbolic heritage contexts with different sustainability tiers. The results indicate that: (1) PSC significantly influences communication intention through attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, with cultural identity playing a central mediating role; (2) digital interactive media participation primarily functions as a contextual enabler, significantly moderating the relationship between perceived behavioral control and communication intention; and (3) substantial structural differences exist across sustainability tiers, with medium-sustainability symbolic contexts demonstrating the strongest psychological activation effects in attitude formation, identity internalization, and intention conversion. Theoretically, this study extends the integrative application of TPB and cultural identity theory by embedding sustainability perception as an upstream cognitive trigger and repositioning cultural identity as a mediating mechanism within symbolic heritage communication processes. Methodologically, it establishes a systematic “sustainability evaluation–stratified modeling–multi-group comparison” analytical framework. Practically, the findings provide empirical guidance for differentiated communication strategies and digital media interventions tailored to symbolic cultural heritage systems.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4511-:d:1934987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.