IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4472-d1934230.html

Assessing Ecological Vulnerability in the Northern Guangdong Mountains Using Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Wenwen Tong

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Southwest China), Chengdu 610218, China)

  • Zongwang Yi

    (107 Geology Team, Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Mineral Development, Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Hao Chen

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Southwest China), Chengdu 610218, China)

  • Hong Liu

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Southwest China), Chengdu 610218, China)

  • Jinghua Zhang

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Southwest China), Chengdu 610218, China)

  • Wenlong Gao

    (Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey (Geosciences Innovation Center of Southwest China), Chengdu 610218, China)

  • Zining Liu

    (Guangdong Geological Survey Institute, Guangzhou 500075, China)

  • Yu Guo

    (107 Geology Team, Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Mineral Development, Chongqing 401120, China)

Abstract

Ecological vulnerability assessment serves as a prerequisite for ecological governance, yet evaluating large-scale ecological vulnerability remains challenging. To address this challenge, this study integrates geological elements into ecological vulnerability assessment, taking Ruyuan Area in the Northern Guangdong Mountains, China, as a case study. The area faces ecological hazards such as land desertification and soil erosion, indicating severe governance challenges. This study selected 14 ecological vulnerability factors and constructed assessment models based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). A total of 800 ecological vulnerability sampling points were obtained by combining field survey data with remote sensing imagery. The models were trained using binary vulnerability labels. The resulting continuous probability outputs were then classified into five vulnerability levels using the natural breaks method to generate the final ecological vulnerability map. It should be noted that the multi-level vulnerability map represents graded probability-based differentiation rather than supervised multi-class prediction. Model performance was validated using three metrics: Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC–ROC), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The CNN (AUC = 0.916) model outperformed the DNN model (AUC = 0.895). According to the CNN-based classification results, non-vulnerable, slightly vulnerable, mildly vulnerable, moderately vulnerable, and highly vulnerable areas accounted for 36.19%, 22.85%, 14.24%, 12.31%, and 14.41% of the total area, respectively. High ecological vulnerability zones were concentrated in Daqiao, Luoyang, Dabu, and parts of Rucheng towns, with soil parent material and vegetation coverage identified as the main contributing factors, among which parent material was the most important. This finding underscores the notable impact of geological factors on local ecological vulnerability. Based on these results, nine ecological–geological subareas were delineated, and targeted ecological protection and restoration recommendations were proposed. This study, employing machine learning techniques, constructed an ecological vulnerability assessment model incorporating geological elements, thereby providing scientific support for targeted ecological governance in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenwen Tong & Zongwang Yi & Hao Chen & Hong Liu & Jinghua Zhang & Wenlong Gao & Zining Liu & Yu Guo, 2026. "Assessing Ecological Vulnerability in the Northern Guangdong Mountains Using Deep Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4472-:d:1934230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4472-:d:1934230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.