Author
Listed:
- Xiao Fan
(China Railway Construction Corporation Suzhou Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd, Suzhou 215009, China)
- Philemon Niyogakiza
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Qian Zhai
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Jean Claude Sugira
(School of Transportation Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)
- Edson da Graça M. Cumbe
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Yiyao Zhu
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Ruchen Ma
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Tianci Han
(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Xiangzhao Liu
(CSCEC City Construction Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100037, China)
Abstract
Fine-grained dredged clay is difficult to reuse without treatment due to its high water content and weak soil structure. From a sustainability perspective, this limitation poses challenges for the beneficial reuse of dredged materials and often leads to disposal and increased demand for natural resources. In this study, the 28-day mechanical behavior of stabilized dredged clay, treated with cement or lime and modified with coir fiber, polypropylene (PP) fiber, and styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) latex, was systematically investigated through experimental measurements, with an emphasis on resource-efficient and sustainable ground improvement. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) results showed that the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 4% cement was 374 kPa, and this value increased linearly with increasing cement content, reaching 2487 kPa at 16% cement. In contrast, the UCS of dredged clay stabilized with 16% lime was approximately 30% of that achieved with cement at the same dosage, at only 780 kPa, indicating the need to balance mechanical performance with the environmental impact associated with high cement usage and its carbon footprint. In addition, the inclusion of fibers significantly enhanced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. The experimental results indicate that the UCS of specimens stabilized with 16% cement could be doubled with the addition of fibers, suggesting the potential to achieve target strength with reduced binder content, thereby contributing to a low-carbon and material-efficient design. Among the fibers tested, coir fiber exhibited better performance than PP fiber in improving UCS, highlighting the effectiveness of natural, renewable, and biodegradable materials in sustainable soil stabilization. Furthermore, fiber length also influenced the UCS of the stabilized soil samples. Additionally, the direct shear test results indicated that both fiber content and length played important roles in determining the internal friction angle of the stabilized soil. It was observed that stabilized soil reinforced with 6 mm fibers exhibited a higher internal friction angle compared to that reinforced with 12 mm fibers. These findings provide insights into optimizing material composition for improved mechanical performance while supporting environmentally sustainable and resource-efficient geotechnical practices.
Suggested Citation
Xiao Fan & Philemon Niyogakiza & Qian Zhai & Jean Claude Sugira & Edson da Graça M. Cumbe & Yiyao Zhu & Ruchen Ma & Tianci Han & Xiangzhao Liu, 2026.
"28-Day Unconfined Compression Screening and Direct-Shear Response of Cement- and Lime-Stabilized Dredged Clay Modified with Fibers and SBR Latex,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4462-:d:1934089
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4462-:d:1934089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.